My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008_0114_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
2008
>
2008_0114_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
12/27/2011 4:16:04 PM
Creation date
12/27/2011 3:03:32 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
268
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
question, reverse course by turning right and traveling east to the controlled intersection <br />and then perforniing a U-turn. If such a m-aneuver ever happens at all (and we doubt it <br />w 'fl), it will be extremely rare, <br />I I I <br />Wenck Associates,, study these specific <br />In fac.t. we h6ve had our trai"fic consultant., <br />concerns since the Plaiml'ng Commission meeting. Attached is their report on, this <br />Situation. You will see from Wenck's report that during 8.5 hours of data -col ection., <br />duri ng the busiest times oft o day, they wit nessed 2' 33 ) U-tunis at the Target Intersect i on. <br />Less than all of these U-turns (1 03) were made by cars leaving Har Mar. Not one <br />vehicle had to stop or back up to complete the U-turn. Again, this controlled intersection <br />does not allow traffic exiting Ha• Mar to interact with this U-t,urn traffic. Therefore, the <br />seal l increase 11i traffic our redevelopment Neill bring to the controlled intersection will <br />have no affect whatsoever on the shttation. <br />As you have heard firom us at the September City Counicil Meeting, our Anchor Tenwit <br />,leases do not give us the ability to change, the en trances or the exits to the Cont r. This <br />ebinge to ou'• entrance would give certain tenants the right to tenninate their lease and <br />would cause the Landlord to breach of per leases. For these reasons I. <br />1 we cannot do this <br />Out lot Redevelopment at the risk of losing Anchor Tenant Rent and/or Anchor Tenants,, <br />Tie condition inipoised by the Planning Commission of having to close the right-Out exit <br />at the westem exit on to County Road B will unfortunately kill this redevelopment proJect <br />A, <br />mid all the additional property improvements associated with 'It. <br />At your convemence, I would like to discuss this project with you. We will not be able to <br />proceed with this redevelopment of the Firestone Outlot if w� have to close our western <br />exit (right -gut) to County Road B. I will co'ntact you, to discuss thi's further prior to the <br />Upcoming city Council meetin&y. <br />Sincerely, % <br />m mes Realty S ces C <br />es <br />c <br />J T i <br />lei, eeos s n V Aa. DSSwj i <br />reacn7tsoon • o <br />f <br />on. s <br />hne 651-582-3877 <br />Emai'l: jas@eamc.coin <br />cc", Craig Klausing <br />Amy IhIan <br />To Kough <br />Tammy Dust <br />Dan Role <br />Bflj Malinen <br />Debra Bloom <br />Thomas Pasichke <br />Duane Schwartz <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.