Laserfiche WebLink
16 <br />17 <br />18 <br />19 <br />20 <br />21 <br />22 <br />23 <br />24 <br />25 <br />216 <br />27 <br />28 <br />29 <br />30 <br />31 <br />32 <br />33 <br />34 <br />35 <br />316 <br />37 <br />�3 <br />39 <br />40 <br />41 <br />42 <br />43 <br />44 <br />145 <br />k It <br />C', Doggle Day Camp (daytime boarding) shall be limited to 70 dogs (amended per <br />PC recommendation). <br />D* No outdoor pet exercising/activity shall be allowed. <br />E. The tenant space shall be constructed andlor improved in a manner that does not <br />cause nuisances outside of the premises and which meets the City's noise <br />0 1 <br />ordinance. <br />01 <br />F* Pet waste will be handled 'in compliance with applicable building and/or health <br />L <br />clode requirements. <br />8.0 PLANNING COMMISSION ACTION, <br />8.1 On Deicember'7, 2007, the Roseville Planning Conunission held the public hearing <br />regarding the PetSmart request. No residents were present to address the Commission. <br />8.2 The City Planner explained two conditions that should be amended to be consistent with <br />the request. The first correction was to correct the numbers in condition "A" from 108 <br />dogs and 15 eats to 108 dog kennels and 15 cat kennels. The second correction was to <br />condition "C'" where the homes of which dogs/cats could be dropped off for kenneling, <br />grooming, and day care would. be as early as 7 am. <br />8.3 Carol Lansing of Faegre and Benson (Applicants representa'ti*ve) reviewed PetSmarts <br />proposal in Roseville; provided details of pet, boarding size and doggie day camp; <br />reviewed similar projects in Burnsville, Maple Grove and Eden Prairie; and spoke to the <br />two Proposed condition modifications. <br />8.4 The Commission discussed the proposal With the City6 Planner and applicant specific to <br />the potential increase in traffic (mini mal), nose (minlimal to none), and odors/waste <br />01 <br />removal (subject to permits), and services provided (growing demand). <br />8.5 The Planning Commission voted 7-0 to APPROVE the recommended ZONING TEXT <br />modifilration and 7-0: to recommend APPROVAL of the CONDITIONAL USE PERMIT <br />AMENDMENT for PetSmart with amendeld changes, to condition "A" and "C", based on <br />the comments and findings ngs of Section 6 and conditions of Sect i 0 on 7 of the project report <br />dated December 7. 20070 <br />PF07-063—RCA-0 I 1408, doe Page 6 of 7 <br />