Laserfiche WebLink
ATTACHMENT F <br />Staff n�ote�d t11 at part of the rte otiiatiion process with the developer would be <br />ongoing diIsculssilon�s re arditn landscaping; and Com�m�itssilonee�r Doh�e�rty <br />suIgge�ste�d t11 at if mature trees were available elsewhere on the property, and if <br />possilbl�e�, that the r be relocated to the north side of the silts. <br />FuIrthe�r dilsculssilon� iln�cl�uIde�d potential tuIrn�arouln�d, de�pe�n�diln on where Lilt y or <br />developer - owned property was de�te�rrmiln�e�d to be uIse�d, base�d on ongoing <br />negotiations t ®r access iIn�to the athl�e�tilc file�l�d (park) area, staff; suI gge�ste�d <br />proposal suIpportiln wilde�n�iln ®t the roadway after the curve t ®r additional space, <br />with the roadway twenty-four feet (24") iln width uIp t® thiat poiln�t; de�dilcatilon ®t the <br />plat and rig ht - ®t -war maintenance base�d on spe�cilfilc agre�e�rme�n�ts ye�t t® be <br />drafted as a PuIbl�i1c Irmprove�rme�n�t Contract; whether the north side sh�ouIl�d be <br />de�sii gn�ate�d as an ou�tl�ot or riot and rationale for such a de�sii gn�atiion , with the <br />PuI bl�iic Works and Planning De�partrme�n�ts suIpportiin the roadway as proposed iin� <br />the staff report as a right-of-way de�dilcatilon�, to incorporate l�an�dscapiln to <br />achieve the gateway goal rather than as an ou tl�ot; and advantages t® have <br />someone else (il.e'., developer) responsible t ®r rmailn�tailn�iln the landscaping rather <br />than an added Lilt expense and use ®t staff re�soubce�s. <br />Additional dilsculssilon iln�cl�ulde�d trail con�n�e�ctilon�s t® the path ®r silde'wal�k ye�t t® be <br />de�te�rrmiln�e�d; park and wetland area designations; de�te�rrmiln�atilon ®t a <br />re�cormrme�n�datilon�, at the dilscre�tilon ®t the Parks and Re�cre�atilon Cormmmilssilon�, as <br />t® land ®r cash iln lieu ®t t ®r park de�dilcatilon�; ongoing dilsculssilon�s with staff and <br />the developer, and preference expressed by the Cormrmilssilon�, t ®r a pathway <br />be�hiln�d the bulill�diln t® continue con�ne�ctil ons as a pug bl�ilc arme�niIty, as well as t® <br />encourage re�silde�nts ®t the facill�ilty t® walls outside with a conne�ctil on t® ether <br />bulill�diln s, and base�d ®n advocacy ®t the Parks and Re�cre�atil on Cormrmilssilon as <br />part ®t the�ilr re�cormrme�ndatilon process, and con�silde�ratil on ®t a possible transit <br />conne�ctil on off Cleveland and optilon�s t ®r mmakiln the area and project more <br />tran�silt-frile�ndl r. <br />Ms. Radel advilse�d that staff wouIl�d re�vile�w plans t® verify closest transit stops, <br />and encourage developers t® take that ilnt® consilde�ratil on, base�d ®n suIpport ®t <br />Me�tropol�iitan Transit re�pre�se�ntatiive�s and future plans iin the area, and iin Iii ht of <br />future de�ve�l�op antiiciipate�d iin the area. <br />Cormrmiissiione�r Gottfried, base�d on e�xpe�rtiise�, noted thiat access iin�to the site was <br />l�iim�iite�d to l�arge�r bu�se�s, with the e�xce�ptiionn of ciircull�ator and /or metro mmobiil�iity <br />ve�hilcl�e�s; and suI gge�ste�d that the developer coHsnde�r can�opy he�il ghts when <br />con�strulctiln the bulill�diln t® make sure they were ®t a he�il ght t® accommodate <br />such mass transit optilon�s t ®r l�oadiln and uIn�l�oadiln , as well as whether an off- <br />street cult-ouIt couIl�d be ilncl�ulde�d, n�otiln the difficulty iln Cleveland Avenue being a <br />Count y Road, and whether Me�tropol�iitan Transit was open to diisculssiion�s on <br />applicable transit optiion�s. <br />FuIrthe�r diisculssiion iin�cl�uIde�d the statues of Ciity Council approval of the Appl�e�wood <br />Point 11 project, and val�iidiity of the Pre�l�iimmiin�ary Plat, with Mr. Paschke advising <br />thiat thiat siitulatiion was part of the rationale for iin�cl�uIdiin the Pre�l�iimmiin�ary Plat <br />approval for those lots as part of th�iis appl�iicatiion�, and repackaging for the Ciity <br />Council antiiciipate�d at the�iir Se�pte�rm be�r 15, 2008 rme�e�tiin g. <br />Applicant, United Properties, Alex Hall (owner representative) and Kevin <br />Teppen (MFRA - Site and landscaping engineer) <br />Mr. Hall addressed variiou�s q�uIe�stiion�s of the Commmmiissiion and clarified developer <br />iinte�nt on variiou�s aspects of the project. <br />Mr. Hall hii ghl�ii ghte�d and expanded on staff; s report related to access and <br />tulrnarouln�d, with a proposed access road on�to the site on the north side for both <br />the se�niior cooperative buliil�diin and the assiiste�d l�iiviin buliil�diin ; proviide�d visual <br />