2008_1013_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Hoisington Koegler Group Inc. Pulst opposed this change. No motion to amend Roe's initial motion was made, so Roe's original motion was putt to a vote with the second to last paragraph remaining in the policy. Vote: 7 yes,, 6 no. Motion approved. SC approved Roe"s proposed master plans policy, which included replacing afl instances of -r ""acknowledged" with ""addressed. The discussim than moved to the topic of existing master plans and Fifield explained that the draft updated Comp Plan currently doesn't in�clulde existing master plans. Pulst sulggested that the questim is whether or not to reconnect existing master plans to the updated Comp Plan. IhIm sulggested the SC sh�oulld not have the authority to take existing master plans oust of the updated Comp Plan. She recommended that the City Council is responsible for reviewing each master plan and deciding whether or not it sh�oulld stay in the updated Comp Plan. Pulst disagreed with IhIm and said whether or not master plans are incorporated in the updated Comp Plan is part of the SC's charge. IhIm made a motion to retain existing master plans in the updated Comp Plan, in�cluldin�g all of the small area /land ulse plans currently in the Comp Plan, in�cluldin�g Twin Lakes, Aron�a-H�am�lin�e, McCarron�'s, etc. lh�lan�'s motion was not seconded. Fifield clarified that since January, the con�sulltan�ts have been proposing that the updated Comp Plan wound not in�clulde all of the master plans. IhIm made a follow-up motim to retain the Twin Lakes Master Plan at a minimum in the updated Comp Plan. Motion was seconded by Sands. In disculssion�, DeBen�edet asked whether there wound be any issules with the existing Twin Lakes Master Plan and the updated Land Use chapter of the Comp Plan, particullarly with the new land ulse categories and designations. Miller responded that there is a possibility that inconsistencies will be created by the updates to the Land Use chapter between the Twin Lakes Master Plan and the updated Comp Plan. The Twin Lakes Master Plan mays need to be updated following the adoption of the updated Comp Plan. Pulst reiterated that master plans still exist even if they are not incorporated into the Comp Plan. Roe sulggested that the questim is whether to leave the master plan in and let the City Council make the decision to take it oust or take it oust and let the City Council make the decision to punt it back in. He favors taking master plans oust and letting the City Council putt them back in. Koegler asked whether IhIm wound be comfortable with updating the Comp Plan with specific guidelines and/or policies from the Twin Lakes Master Plan.