2008_0728_packet - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

11 3 will continue to be met. Although a cross parking agreement between the office and 11 F 4 shopping center may already exist, staff is working with PHS to determine whether an 11 F F updated agreement is necessary to accommodate the increased parking demand of the 11 `56 expanded office property. 1111F, 7' 965 As discussed above, general concept site plans propose a building setback of less than 3 11 1`5 8 feet from the southern property boundary; the Planning Commission recommended 1111,15 9 realigning the southern lot line as part of the PUD approval process so as to immediately 1160 achieve a 10-foot setback, Because the current configuration of the parcels could 11611 conceivably have advantages for the future redevelopment of the shopping center 1162 property, Planning Division staff recommends allowing the office expansion to go 1163 forward without re-platting, but ensuring that a I 0-foot setback is achieved if and when 1164 the properties are no longer under common ownership. This could be accomplished by 1161"'5 recording against the shopping center property the legal description of land that would be 1166 conveyed to the office property at the time either property is sold separately to a different 1167 owner, 1168 10.0 RECOMMENDATION 1169 10.1 At the duly noticed public hearing, the Planning uommission voted 6-0 to recommend 1170 approval of the GENERAL CONCEPT PUD, subject to the following conditions: 11711 a. no patient care shall be provided on site; 1172 b. the applicant shall work with staff in the creation of a landscape plan to be submitted 1173 for FINAL PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT approval that includes heightened screening 1174 to mitigate the visual and noise effects of the service access and trash enclosure on 1171") the residential property across Hamlin e Avenue; 1176 c. a sidewalk at least 6 feet in width shall be provided between the western end of the 1177 existing office building and the adjacent drive lane; 1178 d. the applicant shall provide for recording against the shopping center property a 1179 parking agreement to ensure that the 118 parking spaces required for the office use 1180 are accommodated between the two properties regardless of whether the properties 11811 are under common ownership; 1182 e. the applicant shall provide for recording against the Roseville Covenant Church 1183 property a parking agreement to ensure that the additional parking demands created 1184 by periodic employee trainings is accommodated without the need to utilize parking 1181") in nearby public rights-of-way; 1186 f. the applicant shall realign the parcel boundaries common to the shopping center and 1187 office properties to add enough land to achieve a I 0-foot building setback between 1188 the proposed building and the southern side property line as part of the FINAL 1189 PLANNED UNIT DEVELOPMENT approval process; and 1190 g. the property shall remain on the property tax rolls. ["F08-024—RCA-072808.doc Page 5 of 6