|
Attachment E
<br />52 Ms. Bloom adviise'd that, u n�de'r cuIrre'n�t re'gull�atiion�s, ru n�off from a sine' cou�l�d n�ot iin�cre'ase', re'q�u�iiriin vol�ul m�e�
<br />5'3 re'du ctiion an�d iin�fiil�tratiion re'du ctiion m�iitii gatiion�, as re'gull�ate'd an�d pe'rfmiitte'd by the RCWD. Ms. Bloom n�ote'd the
<br />54 e'xiisti�ni g hiom�e's on Fe'rniwood ani d Jose'phiiInie' Road, ani d overiand emergency storm� wate'r flows ini p ace' for m�ore�
<br />55
<br />than l six nn�ch�e's (T) ®f rain n' wilth�iln twe'n�ty-fou�r (24) hI ounrs, an�d pone' nn�stal�l�atn on needed t® accommn odate' an�y
<br />56 additional ru�nt off, that wou�l�d be acco mpl�nsh�e'd by the de've'l�ope'r through a seine's ®f ilnl fill�tratilon asiIn�s t® n�me'e't those
<br />5 7' re�q�u�i�re'm�e'nits; ani d an overian ow e'sta iIshie' d on i o k 2 to avoiI d aniy dam�age' to othie'r hiom�e's during e'xtre'm�e�
<br />58
<br />ra it nl e�ve'nl ts.
<br />59 Path�ways
<br />60 Ms. Bloom adviise'd that the Ciity 11s Pathway Master Plan proviide'd for a con�n�e'ctiion al�on CouIn�ty Road C2 for the
<br />61 e'n�tnre' length ®f the plat, an�d that the de've'lope'r 1s provilsilon' for a pe'de'strnan�/bncycl�e' con�n�e'ctn on was con�snste'n�t With
<br />62 that Master Plan, an�d that the proposed pathway connected to Le'xiin ton Ave'n�u�e an�d Jose'ph�iin�e' Road, an�d
<br />6'3 wou�l�d be part of the de'diicatiion re'q�u�iire'd of the de've'l�ope'r.
<br />&4 Ve'h�iicu�l�ar Traffiic
<br />65 Ms. Bloom proviide'd e'xte'n�siive' comment on the e'xiistiin an�d proposed traffiic con�diitiion�s, an�d traffiic stu�diie's re'late'd
<br />66 to th�iis area an�d the proposed de've'l�opm�e'n�t. Ms. Bloom n�ote'd that Coin n�ty Road C2 was a Ciity street, an�d had
<br />6 7' n�e�ve'r been connected; an�d fu�rth�e'r n�ote'd that when Ge'orge' Re'nl�nn deve'lope'd the housing com�pl�e'x that nn�cl�u�de'd
<br />68 the Le'xiin ton Apartment com�pl�e'x an�d oth�e'r h�ou sirn u n�iits irn 1998, CouIn�ty Road C2 de'ad-e'n�de'd an�d the're' was
<br />69 n�o cul-de-sac irn e'xiiste'n�ce'. Ms. Bloom adviise'd that staff's research had iin�diicate'd that the're' was an initial
<br />7'0 proposal i�ni 1988 to connect Coulnity Road C2, bult that iIt had niot been we' l�l�-re'ce'iIve' d by the nie' III hi borhiood; thiu1s
<br />7'1 cau siin�g pl�an�s to be redrawn an�d accesses re�vi�se' d for the apartm�e'nit com�p e'x ani d some single-family hiom�e's. Ms.
<br />7'2 Bloom n�ote'd that there' was a diIscuIssiIonl an�d m�otilon before the Cilty Council at that tinmme' to vacate' the Cou�n�ty
<br />7`3 Road C2 right-of-way, bunt that ilt had fanl�e'd as the e'l�e'cte'd offncnal�s wan�te'd to pre'se'rve' the abi�l�ilty to con�stru�ct ilt iln�
<br />T14 the fu�tu, re�.
<br />7'5 Ms. Bloom re'vne'we'd the Cilty"s traffic stuldy, u siln e'xnstnn con�diltilon' s, an�d that of the proposed residential
<br />7'6 de've'l�opm�e'n�t, itn� conju�n�ctiIon� with the Citty 11s con�su�l�tiln�g traffilc e�n�gitn�e�le'r, SRF Con�su�l�tiln�g, including re�vile�w of
<br />7 . .... 7' e'xiistiin tu�rn�s at fiive' (5) m�ajor iin�te'rse'ctiion�s. Ms. Bl�oom� adviise'd that all of the iin�te'rse'cti�onis we're' ope'ratiIni g at a
<br />7'8 Level A du�riIn�g a.m�./p.m�. peak h�ou�rs; n�oti�ni g that aniythiiIni g rated above' a Level C was a tl"li iIni du1stry accepte e've' ,
<br />7'9 an�d one su�pporte'd by the Cilty of Rose'vnl�l�e'. Ms. Bloom advnse'd that iln' appl riln additional traffi�c, cal�cu�l�ate'd at 268
<br />80 trips pe'r day, from the additional twe'n�ty-e'n ght (28) homme's an�d the'nr dnstribultion alone the roadway syste'm�,
<br />81 iin�cl�u�diin an�tiiciipatiin the'iir most pre'diictabl�e' flow an�d iimpacts to those iide'n�tiifiie'd iin�te'rse'ctiion�s, iit was determined
<br />82 that the iin�te'rse'ctiion�s wou�l�d con�tiin�u�e' to operate' overall at a Level A. Ms. Bloom n�ote'd that, if there' had been an�y
<br />8'3 iin�diicatiion� that there' wou�l�d be a ch�an�ge' or de'cre'ase' irn� th�e'iir level of ope'ratiion�, staff wou�l�d re'q�u iire' that the
<br />&4 de've'l�ope'r con�stru�ct m�iitii gatiion steps. However, Ms. Bl�oom adviise'd that, irn th�iis case', staff found n�o ne'e'd for such
<br />85 m{ iitii gatiion�. M ge'n�e'ral�, Ms. Bloom adviise'd that whiffle' there' had been some diiscu ssiion if CouIn�ty Road C2 sh�ou�l�d
<br />86 be extended throng h at th�iis poiin�t dune' to additional traffiic, staff four n�d n�o e'viide'n�ce' to sulpport iit as a m{ iitii gatiion step
<br />8 7' re'late'd to th�iis de've'l�opm�e'n�t.
<br />1
<br />88 Ms. Bl�oom� adviise'd that, accordiin�g to Pol�iice' Department records at the m�aj I or i�n�te'rse'ctiion�s irn the area over the
<br />89
<br />last three' (3,) years, there' was n�oth�iin to be se'rve'd by addiin an additional an mega other than perhaps aiidiin�g
<br />90 those Coin n�ty Road C2 cull -de' -sac re'siide'n�ts. Ms. Bloom n�ote'd that iit was difficult to tulrn� north on Le'xiin ton�
<br />91 Ave'n�u�e'; howe've'r, she n�ote'd that the proposed residential de've'l�opm� e'n�t wouel�d provide' an additional access poiIn�t
<br />92 for that e'n�tnre' area.
<br />9'3 RosevilIg Pu�bl�iic Works, Environment, an�d Tran�sportatiion PWET) Com�m�iissiion�
<br />94� Ms. Bloom adviise'd that the Ciity 11 s PWET Advisory Com�m�iissiion' had re'viie'we'd the Pre'l�ii m�i�n�ary at at th�e'nr m�e'e'tnn�g
<br />95
<br />last we'e'k, an�d found that there' we're' ade'quate' easements an�d buffers arou�n�d the we'tl�an�ds.
<br />96 Ms. Bloom n�ote'd that the PWET Com�m�iissiion re'viie'we'd the proposed Ciity standard stre'e't wiidth�s at th�iirty-two foot
<br />9 7' (3,2"); an�d when asked for the'nr re'commn e'n�datn on on e'xte'n�dnn Cou�n�ty Road C2 at th�ils tinmme', we're' n�ot su�pportnve'
<br />98
<br />®f doiIn s®, howe've'r, th�e' y recommended re'tann�nn the right-of-way.
<br />99 At the re'que'st ®f Ch�ailr Boe'rn gte'r, Ms. Bl�oo+m re'vne'we'd pe'rce'ptnon�s for I ®w e'l�e'vate on on l the e'n�tnre' Block 1
<br />100 compared t® the su�rrou�n�den area; an�d staff's en�ve'ste gate on for possibl�e' we'tl�an�d pulrpose's, bunt ilts lack ®f we'tl�an�d
<br />101 characte'riestecs. Ms. Bl�oo�m advese'd that the area was proposed t® re'taen ilts cu�rre'n�t e'l�e'vate on�, an�d that the 1-5
<br />102 homme's iln' that area we're' proposed as wal�koults., an�d that those drieve'ways wou�l�d have' a thre'e' percent (3,%) grade'
<br />10'3 t® Cou�n�ty Road C2.
<br />1 G14 At the re'que'st ®f Ch�ailr Boe'rie gte'r, Ms. Bl�oo�m con�firm� e'd that the grade' ®f Fe'rn�wood was at a feve' percent (5%)
<br />105 grade' from the hill an�d l�e've'l�e'd off from that poiIn�t t® a 9.10 t® 85.
<br />Page 2 of 12
<br />
|