My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
1981_0713_packet
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Packets
>
1981
>
1981_0713_packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
1/9/2012 9:13:14 AM
Creation date
1/9/2012 9:07:53 AM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
123
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
LefiNobl-Dwilk HIM 10-1� <br />APPLICANT: <br />RHIMI <br />City of Roseville <br />ACTION REQUESTED: Amendment to Zoning Ordinance Controlling <br />Newspaper Tubes <br />The City's legal counsel, Peterson, Bell, and Converse, upon inquiry from <br />Mr. North, Assistant City Manager, indicate that lin their opinion, the City <br />would have a right to eniact such legislation if they took care not to <br />I <br />"discriminate against or in favor of any particular newspaper or classifi- <br />cation of papers". A copy of that letter is attached to this repott. <br />2. On 11 March 1981, the City sent notices to the four newspapers serving <br />the Roseville area informing them of the 23 March hearing to be held by <br />the Council. ■ copy of that notice is attached. <br />Representatives of the newspapers appeared at the Council meeting and <br />voiced their concerns. A copy of the Roseville Sun Newspaper article <br />describing that meeting is attached for your information. It gives a <br />rather good overview of the meeting rosults. The City Council also <br />received a letter dated 23 March 1981 from the Minneaj)olis Star-Tribune <br />indicating their opposi tic n to the amendment and noting that <br />"We are qlad to cooperate and provide a flexibl-0. response with <br />respect to the placement and type of tul)es. We have made, <br />accommodations in tbe. past with other cmmuni.Hes who had <br />similar concern.c,-. We w',11 bo ploasr%d t-o cooperate wit <br />Roseville (- li,ty c(jullci- I <br />i It. f i r1di 'M s,-)t- isfncl-ory 'C And I (" s s <br />restrictiv(2 c,-ojiLjt-r)jj than the prop();tiot_l 11 <br />"A copy of t ha t, rn t- t n r i :-. a t ta c I i rd <br />As you wi.11 note from tlio news ;paper -_irf ic1(-, t-11C COL-ITIcil decided to re-fe'r <br />the newspaper tuhv PIt-Iceme"t rT1je_.c;tj0jj J--)33c I t-(-) Hie Pla. nninq Commisslion for <br />their corisiderat-.ican at- their 0 Mny 1")81- me(ltinq. Accordingly, on 30 March <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.