Laserfiche WebLink
CASE NUMBER: 1304-81 6 May 1981 <br />APPLICANT: City of Roseville Page 2 <br />1981, the City sent notices to the newspaper companies concerned informing <br />them of the Planning Commission hearing and inviting them to a meeting <br />with the staff on 8 April to discuss the problem and possible solutions., <br />At the 8 April meeting we had representation from the four newspapers <br />concerned. The Saint Paul Dispatch was represented by Jack - Delo., Circulation <br />Manager, accompanied by Michael Maenner, a legal counsel. The Minneapolis <br />Star was represented by Lee Barten, Circulation Manager, accompanied by <br />Bjorn Calson from the Circulation Department-, and Sarah Jaye attorney for <br />the Star. Grey Enright appeared for the Lillie Suburban papers as well <br />as a representative from the Sun Newspapers. Attached are subsequent <br />letters received from the Minneapolis Star-Tribune, and the Sun Newspapers <br />regarding their views on the question. <br />4. The basic problem as expressed at the meeting is that the supply of young <br />people willing to deliver papers today has substantially diminished. They <br />note. that the hardships due to weather and conformance to the strict <br />delivery schedule is not as attractive to young people as it once was. <br />They note further that the availability of better paying-part time jobs <br />makes the newspaper carrier job less competitive in today's job market. <br />Thus, newspaper circulation managers in general have resorted to the use <br />of "adult carriers" making the delivery by car. For this purpose, in their <br />opinion, a tube for placement of the newspaper at the curb is essential. <br />The number of tubes thus placed in the City has substantially increased <br />in the last two years. The Saint Paul Paper indicates that approximately <br />29 percent of their deliveries in Roseville are done by automobile. The <br />Minneapolis Star indicates about 350 tube locations in Roseville. They <br />indicate that in their opinion rarely does a single subscriber take both <br />papers. In general, they note that the westerly portion of the City <br />seems to orient more heavily toward the -Minneapolis papers with the eastern <br />area oriented toward the Saint Paul 1�aper. The Roseville Sun does some of <br />i <br />'ts deliver' I <br />y by mail and some by private carrier. Though they recognize <br />the potential concern when and if all deliveries are done by motor carrier <br />depositing the paper in tubes, they express general opposition to restriction <br />on the placement and use of the newspaper tubes. The possibility of each <br />homeowner having a single tube without the name of a newspaper on it for <br />the use of all newspapers and/or advertising material was discussed but <br />not endorsed. <br />5. Their basic concern relates to the. economics of del i.verinq papers. We <br />suggested therefore that it would be hell)ful if we were aware of the <br />-numbers involved so that we could better understand the problem prior to <br />considering a solution (a process essential In find Linq solutions to any <br />problem) . Both 1)rinclpal papers (S tar - Tribune and Dispatch) were reluctant <br />to discuss the numbers in the presence of their competitors. At our <br />request, they did agree to send us additional linformation reqardlng the <br />