2012-01-24_PWETC_AgendaPacket - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Member Felice suggested consideration of a period of time identified for the City and haulers to reach consensus, and if not, to proceed to a single hauler. Member Vanderwall noted one concern in the process is the perception that the City is attempting to negatively impact local businesses and create additional unemployment. Member Vanderwall suggested that the process include maintaining the ability of existing haulers in keeping similar percentages to their current business operations. Member Gjerdingen noted that Member Vanderwall's suggestion was also part of the 2002 committee recommendation. AW Member Vanderwall however noted that it was important to make sure the rates were cost - effective for Roseville residents, while meeting business and operational costs for the haulers Member Felice concurred, also nc the board, arrived at by consensus participation level. need that those rat re equal across rs and reasonab rge and Chair DeBenedet suggested moving forward with a recommendation to the City Council that organized trash collection be actively pursued with future implementation with the purpose of addressing specific goals, including preserving with as much practicality as possible the current percentages of independent haulers within the Roseville community. Discussion ensued regarding the number of haulers (e.g. four to seven) within a contract period; use of the Best Value Procurement process; how to establish and weight criteria; how the number and /or type of residential complaints of vendors would impact their proposals and consideration; vendor competition; availability of sizes and types of collection containers based on customer preference. Criteria discussed randomly included: destination of the trash; average city cost based on weighting with all customers paying the same amount; variables of Page 7 of 17