My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2012-02-09_PR_Packet
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Parks & Recreation
>
Parks & Recreation Commission
>
Packets
>
2012
>
2012-02-09_PR_Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/10/2012 4:53:06 PM
Creation date
2/10/2012 4:44:25 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
50 5. MASTER PLAN IMPLEMENTATION DISCUSSION <br />51 Commission Chair Etten informed the Commission of the impending court hearing for the <br />52 most recent appeal of the City Bond process. This hearing is scheduled for Wednesday, <br />53 February 8, 2012. Brokke announced that the first round of Bonds were sold on December <br />54 29, 2011. The money has been secured and the bond requirement clock has begun, but the <br />55 funds are not available until after the February, 8, 2012 hearing and the subsequent ruling. <br />56 ■ D. Holt voiced his frustration with the citizen group that has filed the appeals. <br />57 Because of the appeals the interest rate for the first bond release increased from <br />58 2.15% to 2.45% costing the City an additional $260,000 in interest costs. Holt feels it <br />59 is important that the community know the impact of this group's actions. <br />60 ■ Ristow and other Commissioners inquired into the possibility of a counter suit to help <br />61 cover damages caused by these appeals. Brokke explained that is a Council action and <br />62 will be left to their choice in how to best handle the situation. <br />63 Ristow mentioned how this is similar to past Twin Lakes actions that <br />64 resulted in the development falling through. Ristow feels that it is <br />65 important that Roseville Citizens realize that their elected officials <br />66 were selected to make decisions. <br />67 Commissioners would like to remind the community of upcoming Master Plan Renewal <br />68 Community and Neighborhood meetings. Community involvement has been the cornerstone <br />69 for the Master Plan process from the beginning and will continue through the upcoming <br />70 Renewal Process. <br />71 ■ January 25 — 7pm at the Roseville Skating Center, Rose Room. This meeting will <br />72 feature updates on renewal program projects, project timeline for the coming four <br />73 years and information on the funding schedule. <br />74 ■ February 8 — 6:3 0pm at the Roseville Skating Center, Rose Room. This <br />75 Neighborhood and Community Meeting will focus on Lexington Park Improvements <br />76 and plans for projects there in 2012. <br />77 ■ February 15 — 6:30pm at the Harriet Alexander nature Center. This Neighborhood <br />78 and Community Meeting will focus on HANC Improvements and plans for projects <br />79 there in 2012, including the replacement of the boardwalk, HVAC improvements, <br />80 other possible interior work and natural resource restoration on site. <br />81 <br />82 The first ma j or decision in the Parks and Recreation Renewal Program is to consider a <br />83 general procurement method. Staff is proceeding cautiously until after the February 8th <br />84 hearing. Work needs to take place during this waiting period to allow us to maintain the <br />85 aggressive timeline set to accommodate the bond requirements. Brokke briefed the <br />86 commission on the three options scheduled to be presented to the Council on Monday, <br />87 January 9, 2012. Staff has identified pros and cons for each method and will look to the <br />88 Council for direction. The goal is to select a process that gets the best development program <br />89 for the City. The Parks and Recreation Master Plan Renewal Program aims to get good <br />90 projects for a good price for a long period of time. <br />91 Best Value (BV) was the method used during for the Skating Center Geothermal <br />92 project. The Best Value Procurement System is facilitated by Arizona State <br />93 University. With this program ASU assists in the development of RFPs and guidance <br />94 with the selection of contractor, consultant and design work as well as producing <br />95 weekly reports and project progress reports. The Best Value system through ASU is <br />96 known for its on -time, on- budget record (98 %). With BV, the City accepts proposals <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.