Laserfiche WebLink
1061 the first three (3) years of the Plan. Once the results of the WRPP became available, Chair Eckman <br />1062 advised that a major Plan Amendment could be submitted. Rather than asking member cities to commit <br />1063 to their current level, as requested by the GLWMO Board for 2012 at $40,000 each, Chair Eckman <br />1064 advised that they would now be asked to commit to $150,000 annually, most likely requiring their <br />1065 adoption of a special storm water utility fee for GLWMO residents. As previously noted, Chair Eckman <br />1066 addressed the need to move the timeline up for the Governance and Finance Task Force to research those <br />1067 options and make a recommendation to the cities. <br />1068 <br />1069 Ms. Correll clarified EOR's recommended action (page 2 of the memorandum) to focus on the first three <br />1070 (3) years of the Plan, followed by a major Plan Amendment in 20I4 with capital improvements identified <br />1071 as a result of the WRPP. Ms. Correll noted that the Plan would still need to include a ten (10) year budget <br />1072 for 2014 — 2021. <br />1073 <br />1074 Member Von De Linde noted that the Plan could not or would not be approved without the budget <br />1075 specified; and that it couldn't be done without a total $300,000 annual commitment from member cites. <br />1076 <br />1077 Member Miller questioned the need for a motion at this time, prior to Task Force discussions and their <br />1078 recommendations, opining that there was not enough clarity at this time as to the source of the money, <br />1079 whether a merger would be recommended or not. <br />1080 <br />1081 Chair Eckman clarified that this action was necessary to proceed, and that the Task Force would be <br />1082 making a recommendation to the GLWMO Board, who would be responsible for the final decision and <br />1083 need to make the actual commitment for what has to be done, with who paid for it and what was actually <br />1084 done a matter for future discussion. <br />1085 <br />1086 Member Barrett concurred with the intent of the proposed motion as a good faith option by the GLWMO <br />1087 Board to proceed with Option 2. <br />1088 <br />1089 Ms. Correll concurred, noting that this $300,000 annual budget commitment from the Board was <br />1090 necessary before the next draft of the Plan could be submitted, to continue on the time table to make edits <br />1091 and close the process by year -end. <br />1092 <br />1093 Motion 11 -09 -10 <br />1094 Member Miller moved, and Member Barrett seconded, removing Option I funding and proceeding with <br />1095 Option 2 from the Third Generation Plan to proceed with the comments received to -date from BWSR and <br />1096 the Metropolitan Council. <br />1097 <br />1098 Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />1099 <br />1100 Motion 11 -09 -11 <br />1101 Chair Eckman moved, Member Von De Linde seconded, directing FOR to revise the Third Generation <br />1102 Plan focusing on the first three (3) years of activity within the ten (10) year plan; acknowledging that a <br />1103 major Plan Amendment will be drafted in year four (4) to account for structural practices developed in the <br />1104 WRPP Implementation Plan and governance /financing decisions. <br />1105 <br />1106 Ms. Correll noted that this action would provide evidence to BWSR that the GLWMO Board was <br />1107 committing to implementing in -the- ground capital improvements, rather than waiting for a year for <br />1108 completion of the WRPP Study and then preparing a plan of action; but by this step indicating that the <br />1109 GLWMO Board had a realistic plan in place if and when grant funds became available; and would meet <br />1 110 their expectations of an organization the age of this WMO. <br />1111 <br />22 <br />