Laserfiche WebLink
154 <br />155 <br />156 <br />157 <br />158 <br />159 <br />160 <br />161 <br />162 <br />163 <br />164 <br />165 <br />166 <br />167 <br />168 <br />169 <br />170 <br />171 <br />172 <br />173 <br />174 <br />175 <br />176 <br />177 <br />178 <br />179 <br />180 <br />181 <br />182 <br />183 <br />184 <br />185 <br />186 <br />187 <br />188 <br />189 <br />190 <br />191 <br />192 <br />193 <br />194 <br />195 <br />196 <br />197 <br />198 <br />199 <br />200 <br />201 <br />202 <br />203 <br />204 <br />Chair Eckman asked that, prior to that meeting, Mr. Petersen provide concrete projections of <br />remaining hours and projects yet to be completed; opining that there should be sufficient contingency <br />funds in the 2011 to facilitate a contract amendment. <br />Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />d) Updates <br />1) GLWMO Joint Powers Agreement (JPA) <br />Chair Eckman requested an update from member city representatives as to the status of Member <br />Miller's draft JPA to be in compliance with new B WSR guidelines. <br />Mr. Maloney advised that the Shoreview City Attorney was currently reviewing the JPA, but had <br />yet to provide his comments, but anticipated that his comments would be similar to those <br />expressed by the Roseville City Attorney. <br />Mr. Schwartz noted the same status; advising that the Roseville City Attorney was withholding <br />any recommendation to the City Council pending a policy discussion on their part regarding the <br />level of financial control the City Council has over the organization outlined in the JPA. Mr. <br />Schwartz noted that the City Attorney represented the City's best interests; and therefore, he <br />would not likely recommend the City giving up financial controls to another agency. <br />Chair Eckman noted, for the record, that the GLWMO Board had been advised by BWSR that <br />they would be unable to submit the next DRAFT of the Third Generation Plan until an updated <br />JPA has been adopted by both cities. Chair Eckman opined that the City Councils' would <br />probably not act on the JPA until the GLWMO Board's presentation to the respective member <br />cities at their City Council meetings, both scheduled for November 21, 2011. <br />Mr. Schwartz advised that the draft JPA would be included in packet materials for the Roseville <br />City Council at the November 21, 2011 regular business meeting. <br />In an effort to make the best use of City Council time, Mr. Maloney advised that it was the intent <br />to have the entire discussion with the Shoreview City Council at their November 21, 2011 Council <br />Work Session, rather than multiple discussion points during the process. <br />2) Lake Association Liaison Reports <br />No updates. <br />Chair Eckman noted that, based on e-mail contacts received as part of the Draft Third Generation <br />Plan comment period, it was her intent to direct Mr. Petersen to provide a copy of the resolution <br />recently adopted by the GLWMO Board regarding "No Wake Zones;" and to also use those <br />contacts as invitations as volunteer lake monitoring plans moved forward in 2012. Chair Eckman <br />advised that she would be seeking contact information for interested volunteers for all represented <br />lakes, not just on Lake Owasso. <br />3) Special Governance/Finance Task Force <br />At the request of Chair Eckman, Member Miller provided an update on development of the base <br />line and analyses from each Task Force subgroup. <br />Chair Eckman advised that the main purpose of the October 27, 2011 Special meeting would be <br />for Board approval of final weighting for the criteria and to develop a recommendation for the <br />cities. Member Miller asked that Mr. Schwartz could make a projector available for that meeting. <br />0 <br />