My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2011-12-15_Minutes
Roseville
>
Commissions, Watershed District and HRA
>
Grass Lake WMO
>
Minutes
>
201x
>
2011
>
2011-12-15_Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/15/2012 11:42:17 AM
Creation date
2/15/2012 11:41:29 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Commission/Committee
Commission/Authority Name
Grass Lake WMO
Commission/Committee - Document Type
Minutes
Commission/Committee - Meeting Date
12/15/2011
Commission/Committee - Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
c) Tom Petersen's Professional Services Contract Proposal —2012 <br />Motion 11- 1211-11 <br />Member Miller moved, and Member Westerberg seconded approval of a Professional Services <br />Agreement between the GLWMO Board and Mr. Tom Petersen for Administrative and Technical <br />Services as presented; later amended to cap monthly technicalladmin. Services compensation at <br />$3,000 monthly without GLWMO Chair approval, and addressed accordingly in the <br />"Compensation Clause; "and authorizing the Chair to execute the amended document. <br />Mr. Petersen briefly reviewed the DRAFT GLWMO Professional Services Agreement dated January <br />of 2012 for consideration of the GLWMO Board; advising that it was identical to that approved for <br />2011, with the exception of the term adjusted that services would continue on a month -to -month basis <br />pending the future of the GLWMO, and at the recommendation of Chair Eckman. Mr. Petersen's <br />draft included a budget page that he noted was preliminary and may need adjustment over time to <br />reflect actual time spent as various challenges of the organization were met over the course of 2012. <br />Chair Eckman suggested that the GLWMO Board consider a monthly cap typical for such agreements <br />to provide more control of the monthly expenses by the Board. <br />Mr. Petersen suggested that language be revised under the "Compensation Clause" on page 2 of the <br />draft agreement that monthly services shall not exceed $3,000 per month without Board approval. <br />Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried <br />d) Sheila Stowell's Recording Secretary Services Contract Proposal — 2012 <br />Motion 11- 1211-12 <br />Member Von De Linde moved, and Member Barrett seconded reinstatement of the Professional <br />Services Agreement between the GLWMO Board and Ms. Sheila Stowell for Recording Secretary <br />Services as presented for 2012 on a month -to -month basis; later amended to revise Section LC <br />(Scope of Services) from delivery of meeting minutes from two weeks (I4 working days) to two <br />weeks (10 working days). <br />Chair Eckman expressed concern with the amount of time for turning around meeting minutes and <br />asked Ms. Stowell if this could be accelerated. <br />Ms. Stowell responded that the rationale in the two (2) week period was intended to address <br />fluctuations in her schedule that would not allow a quicker turnaround of meeting minutes. Ms. <br />Stowell recognized that it was her preference to turn around minutes as quickly as possible; however, <br />she noted the difficulties encountered in 2011 with the more frequent meeting schedule having <br />evolved from quarterly, to monthly and then almost weekly meetings during that time. While <br />understanding the need for the additional meetings, Ms. Stowell noted that this did take a toll on other <br />work commitments; however, she offered to amend Section 1.0 under the Scope of Services from a <br />two (2) week (14 working days) provision to a two (2) week (10 working days) turn around in an <br />attempt to facilitate GLWMO Board concerns. <br />Ayes: 5 Nays: 0 Motion carried. <br />3) FOR Final Invoice for Draft Plan <br />Board members briefly discussed the status of the outstanding FOR final invoice, with the consensus <br />that the Final Invoice would remain pending until delivery of the final product and ownership of the <br />11 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.