Laserfiche WebLink
City Council Strategic Planning Meeting <br /> Monday,January 30,2012 <br /> Page 11 <br /> d. Public Works (Attachment Item 8.g,dated January 30,2012) <br /> Public Works Director Schwartz highlighted short-term goals related to reinvest- <br /> ment in the City's infrastructure; support of Parks Master Plan implementation; <br /> and a strategic plan for the Public Works Department to ensure staff resources. <br /> For long term goals, Mr. Schwartz identified looking at strengthening partnerships <br /> with other departments and communities to further reduce costs; continue to im- <br /> prove customer service of the department; and improved sustainability through <br /> purchases and practices. <br /> e. Community Development(Attachment Item 8.b,dated January 30,2012) <br /> Community Development Director Trudgeon noted that his written submission <br /> included four short-term and two long-term goals, and in the short-term list, he <br /> saw all of them fitting into the lenses identified by Councilmember Pust. Mr. <br /> Trudgeon specifically identified the goals for standards for multi-family proper- <br /> ties: those within the City's control, their visibility and impact to the community, <br /> and relegating the cost to property owners themselves. Mr. Trudgeon further ad- <br /> dressed the dramatic impact of the Neighborhood Enhancement Program (NEP) <br /> to-date for residential properties and similar goals for commercial properties to <br /> address code enforcement issues, and saw no further impact on resources beyond <br /> those already funded and consistent with residential costs. Addressing technolo- <br /> gy goals for access by staff in the field, Mr. Trudgeon reviewed the impacts for <br /> the public in staff and residents having ready access to that information, further <br /> streamlining operations. <br /> Other long-term items, specifically the Northeast Diagonal transportation corri- <br /> dor, Mr. Trudgeon noted would create more resource difficulties, as well as not <br /> being under the control of the City, but having significant impact on the commu- <br /> nity and region. At the end of the day, Mr. Trudgeon noted that the City still <br /> needed to contend with the marketplace, even with great policies and resources in <br /> place. <br /> f. Finance (Attachment Item 8.c, dated January 30,2012) <br /> Finance Director Miller referenced his written submission, noting the goal for <br /> continuing infrastructure replacement funding, while recognizing the tremendous <br /> progress made in shoring up the vehicle, equipment and general facility replace- <br /> ment schedule. However, Mr. Miller noted the need to look at the long-term sus- <br /> tainability of systems and stay on track,urging the City Council to do so. <br /> Mr. Miller noted the need to revisit program priorities, opining that while rank- <br /> ings had been prioritized, in the last ten (10) years, he had not seen any change in <br /> resource allocation; and encouraged Councilmembers to continue looking at that <br /> in absence of new funding or resources, to address lesser valued programs as hint- <br /> ed at by Mr. St. Amour in the four (4) quadrants; and to get more "bang for the <br /> buck," things needed to move among quadrants. Mr. Miller advised that such a <br />