My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0105
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0105
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:26:54 AM
Creation date
7/13/2005 9:00:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/5/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
32
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Organizational City Council Minutes - 1/5/04 <br />Page 11 <br /> <br />items processed at the second and fourth Monday <br />meetings. Mr. Beets noted several exceptions to <br />accommodate holidays and in an effort to provide balance <br />in the meeting schedule, and meet statutory requirements <br />(i.e., zoning issues). <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought clarification of the <br />Council's intent for using the work sessions, voting on <br />action items or not, and the actual number of business <br />meetings proposed. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets reiterated that the work sessions could <br />take on various formats, at the discretion of the Council <br />and the issues before the Council; noting that normally <br />they were for further discussion and study of a smaller <br />number of policy issues (i.e., five issues); and while he <br />didn't anticipate voting other than to provide staff <br />direction, it provided an opportunity for staff and the <br />public to hear more Council feedback, and for the Council <br />to hear more input from the public and staff as applicable. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka wholeheartedly endorsed the <br />work session format; opining that it made for better and <br />more productive business meetings, when discussion could <br />take place prior to action being taken; allowed for more <br />consideration and open discussion of issues; and <br />ultimately allowed for a more process-driven and shorter <br />business meeting, with more information being made <br />available to the public and the Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder sought further clarification on <br />whether voting would be done on various topics and/or <br />consent items at a work sessions; and how many actual <br />business meetings would be held during the year. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing noted that, while the work session would <br />not generally be used for voting purposes, if necessary and <br />due to the fact that it was a duly-noticed public meeting, it <br />could be used for voting if time-sensitive issues were <br />apparent before the next scheduled business meeting. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.