Laserfiche WebLink
�� <br />Apri I 3, ] 974 <br />PLANNING REPOR7 <br />CAS� NUMBER: <br />ApPLICANT: <br />LQCATEON: <br />ACTION R�QUESTED: <br />809-74 <br />Ci1'y Council <br />Ciiy of Roseville <br />Potential Fire Station Sites (See Sketch) <br />Recommendation for Fire Station No. 3 in <br />East Rosevi I � e <br />PLANi�l1NG CONSIDERATIONS: <br />i. Copies of previous reports pr�pared relative to the potentiaf fire station sites <br />are attached for your information. The first report was in response to a <br />request by the City Council to i-he Planning Commiss'son to hold a public <br />hearing ragarding a station site at the northwest carner of County Road 8 <br />and Western. Commeni-s regarding that station iocation are noted in the <br />Planning Repori- (No. 770-73 Dated July 11, i973). The principal <br />asset to the site was the fact that it was convenien# fo a number of the <br />present members of the Fire Department. The principal liabilities of the <br />site was that i� was not si'rategicallylocated to efficiently serve areas north <br />of Highwpy 36 due to the freeway barrier. The Planning Commission <br />recommended against the site. <br />2. ihe Commission was then askeci to review potential sites in the area of� <br />County Road B and Dale Sfreei�. A site was studied and recommended at the <br />southeast corner of the intersection invalving three parcels of land which <br />would accommodate p drive-way access to County Road B east of Dale Street. <br />The principaf,disaclvantage of this property was that it was located on p grade <br />(Dale Street So�th bound) and would require considerable filf. The Council <br />ordered appraisals of i-he properties and found the total cost to be potentially <br />very high, T�is site is indicated on the sketch at the left as Site "B". <br />3. The Cauncil subsequently requested the Planning Commission to consider sites <br />at Cauni-y Road B-2 and Dale Streef. It is in the vicinity of this location that <br />previaus studies done in the post had indicated as the most appropriafe locafion <br />to serve the eastern end of the city. At the March 6th meeting af the Planning <br />Commission, a public hearing was held on three possibilities in the irr�mediate <br />vicinity of the intersection. These are shown on the sketch at the lef� as sites <br />��C��� ������ �1nCi ��E��. �he March 6th repo�t notes the assets and liabi{ifies of these <br />sites. {Report is atfached) it was suggested that of these three, Site "E" located <br />