My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0419
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0419
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:29:02 AM
Creation date
12/15/2005 11:26:06 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/10/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
42
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 04/19/04 <br />Minutes - Page 13 <br /> <br />assist movement); better pavement surface and markings; <br />stormwater improvements; aesthetic improvements; and <br />anticipated installation of a county-owned fiber optic network <br />system for future use. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder further addressed the proposed fiber <br />optic cable installation and discussion ensued regarding possible <br />installation of a supplemental conduit for future government <br />and/or residential use as an economical means to access and <br />enhance conm1unication capabilities. <br /> <br />Further discussion included infrastructure improvements being <br />undertaken by Xcel Energy and Qwest in relocation of some of <br />their services; the locations for designated left and/or right turn <br />lanes; traffic counts in various areas of the proposed project and <br />related safety; and traffic movement issues. <br /> <br />Mr. Soler provided four options for the Council to consider in <br />Phase II of the reconstruction project related to roadway width <br />and prefened lane alignment and development. Mr. Soler <br />reviewed the cunent roadway areas, as well as the options <br />available, and the County's recommendation for the most <br />efficient traffic movement and safety. <br /> <br />Further discussion included Council preference for roadway <br />widening to the north or south; rights-of-way acquisition; <br />railroad track limitations for south-side widening; impacts to <br />property owners; comment provided from business owners and <br />residents at the recent public infon11ation meetings; and projected <br />increased roadway usage. <br /> <br />Mr. Soler advised that Ramsey County was recommending, and <br />was seeking Council concunence and direction, construction of a <br />62' roadway, which would allow for future construction if <br />needed of a five lane roadway, should traffic volumes dictate. <br />Mr. Soler opined that the construction of a 62' roadway, with <br />left tum/medians in the center lane and ten foot shoulders would <br />serve the community well with cunent and projected future <br />traffic volumes. <br /> <br />Further discussion ensued regarding the use of the ten foot <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.