My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2005_1219
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2005
>
CC_Minutes_2005_1219
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:29:43 AM
Creation date
1/17/2006 3:36:24 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
12/19/2005
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 12/19/05 <br />DRAFT Minutes - Page 13 <br /> <br />past budget years, the administration department was now <br />being penalized for those cost savings. Mr. Beets noted <br />that, if oppOliunities came up in the future, staff should be <br />allowed to seek participation. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough advised that staff had an <br />opportunity to come before the City Council with specific <br />requests. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough and Schroeder. <br />Nays: Maschka; Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Motion failed. <br /> <br />6) Kough moved, Schroeder seconded, directing the <br />Public Works Department to reduce the number of <br />commercial lights ($3,000). <br /> <br />Public Works Director Duane Schwartz advised <br />Councilmembers that staff would meet with the Public <br />Works, Environment and Transportation Commission <br />(PWET) and return to the City Council with their <br />recommendations for which lights should be eliminated; <br />and with a draft policy to support that decision; as well as <br />reconsideration of a street light utility. Mr. Schwartz noted <br />that a number of lights had been eliminated as part of the <br />County Road B-2 pathway construction proj ect. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka questioned the actual savings <br />from eliminating lights when balanced with additional <br />public safety concerns. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan suggested exploring shifting costs; <br />and opined her lack of support for removing it from the <br />budget at this time. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Kough and Schroeder. <br />Nays: Maschka; Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Motion failed. <br /> <br />7) Kough moved, Schroeder seconded, deleting the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.