My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0123
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0123
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:29:52 AM
Creation date
1/31/2006 1:21:21 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/23/2006
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session - 01/23/06 <br />Minutes - Page 6 <br /> <br />expertise and knowledge regarding the City's concerns. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch reviewed the number of complaints regarding <br />group homes fielded by staff related to impacts to <br />neighborhoods, rather than the care facility within the <br />structure. Mr. Welsch noted a significant increase in group <br />homes, and complaints, with well over 50 group homes <br />within the community at this time. Mr. Welsch defined the <br />type of neighborhood complaints including, traffic impacts; <br />parking (on site and on the street) with up to 12-14 cars in <br />some locations; deliveries to the site; night time office staff <br />meetings; outdoor storage; late night shift change traffic <br />noise; trash management; and lot coverage. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch reviewed state statute, which allows group <br />homes in single-family districts and the vagueness as to what <br />the city may regulate. Mr. Welsch sought Council direction <br />as to whether to address this issue with legislative <br />representatives, seeking clarification of state statute <br />language. Mr. Welsh acknowledged the pre-emption created <br />by State Statue, Section 462.357, but also recognized that the <br />statute was not clear beyond allowing "the use." Mr. Welsh <br />suggested two immediate remedies: clarification of the <br />statute language adding a sentence stating group homes are <br />subject to the same additional land use and zoning <br />requirements as the next door single-family home; or <br />amendment of the statute to allow for a local Conditional <br />Use Permit (CUP) process, as it does currently in multi- <br />family zones. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch referenced a written legal opinion, dated January <br />6, 2006, on Group Homes prepared by the City Attorney and <br />included in tonight's agenda packet. <br /> <br />Rep. Mindy Greiling <br />Rep. Greiling, following research and discussion with <br />administrative staff at the Minnesota House and City <br />Attorneys, recommended no changes to State Statute, but <br />instead enforcement and consistent application of local <br />ordinances; keeping mindful of application of the federal <br />F air Housing Act, for both group homes and single-family <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.