My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0130
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0130
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:18 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:14:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/30/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
38
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 01/30/06 <br />Minutes - Page 23 <br /> <br />the structure in violation of the provisions of this code or of the <br />order or direction made pursuant thereto. Any action taken by <br />the authority having jurisdiction on such premises shaU [may] <br />be charged against the real estate upon which the structure is <br />located and shall be a lien upon such real estate." <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust suggested that this would allow staff <br />discretion, in consideration of City Attorney Squires' comments <br />regarding the authority already available under current City <br />Code. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Pust; Maschka; Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />Delete Section 106.4 (Violation Penalties) and all of Section 107 <br /> <br />Motion #7 <br />Ihlan moved a variation of her proposed motion 7, to delete <br />Section 107.5 on transfer of ownership. Mayor Klausing <br />declared the motion failed for lack of a second. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan expressed concern that this prOVISIon <br />would hamper owners or rentals or owner-occupied homes, <br />particularly if elderly and/or handicapped, from selling their <br />property unless properly maintained. <br /> <br />Mr. Welsch advised that this was misleading, as it was already <br />part of the seller's full disclosure to potential purchasers. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust concurred with staff, citing the language of <br />Section 107.5 regarding owner furnishing disclosure or notice; <br />and opined it was advantageous for the City so Roseville <br />properties were left well-maintained and not "flipped" to a new <br />owner who would be responsible for overburdened maintenance. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria Street <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn opined that prospective adoption of the IPMC <br />had been considered by various City Councils since mid-1990, so <br />was not being "rushed for adoption." <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.