My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0909
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0909
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:23 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:28:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/9/2004
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Special Study Session - 09/09/04 <br />Minutes - Page 8 <br /> <br />City Manager Beets referenced his memo comments regarding <br />budget recommendations, noting that 1) it was advantageous for <br />the City to pay the right people fairly; and 2) the pay scale in <br />Roseville was approximately five percent below the Stanton V, <br />used for con1parisons, and presented a challenge to the City, <br />quite often n1aking Roseville a training ground for employees to <br />move onward, with the City retaining training costs, and losing <br />valuable employees. <br /> <br />Counciln1ember Schroeder questioned the accuracy of the <br />Stanton V survey with current job market rates. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets further noted that while the COLA was <br />conservatively outlined in 2004 for union negotiations, upon <br />going to arbitration the COLA went to 3% from 2.3%; thereby <br />creating an uncomfortable and unproductive differential among <br />the City's workforce, when non-union COLA was at 2.3%. <br /> <br />Councihnelnber Ihlan referenced Finance Director Miller's <br />memo dated August 24, 2004 summarizing the need for an <br />approxin1ate 11 % levy increase to fund the items recommended <br />by Councilmen1ber Schroeder; and the need for a 15% levy <br />increase using the recommendations in the City Manager's <br />proposed 2005 Budget recommendations, without any additional <br />reductions in expenses or personnel, or additional revenue <br />sources. <br /> <br />Further discussion included annual employee attrition rate of five <br />percent; how to structure additional budget discussions and/or <br />public cormnent hearings; proposed addition of discussions <br />and/or work sessions dealing directly and specifically with the <br />budget; priorities for 2005 and future projections and policy <br />decisions; and detem1ination of consensus to-date. <br /> <br />After further discussion, it was the Council's consensus to direct <br />Finance Director Miller to prepare spreadsheets on each of the <br />written proposals presented (i.e., from Councilmembers Kough, <br />Maschka and Schroeder) to provide side by side comparisons of <br />their recommendations for consideration prior to adoption of the <br />Preliminary Levy at the regular City Council meeting on <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.