My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_0913
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:31:31 AM
Creation date
2/15/2006 10:46:43 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/13/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
46
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 09/13/04 <br />Minutes - Page 34 <br /> <br />HRA Levy Fund. <br /> <br />Roll Call [2005 Proposed HRA Levy] <br />Ayes: Schroeder, Kough and Klausing. <br />Nays: Ihlan and Maschka. <br /> <br />John Kysylyczyn, 3083 N Victoria <br />Mr. Kysylyczyn provided a bench handout with his interpretation <br />of proposed levy and inflation calculations. <br /> <br />10. Briefing about a Twin Lakes Redevelopment Financial Plan Briefing about a <br />Twin Lakes <br />Tim Whitten, AlA of Rottlund Homes Redevelopment <br />Mr. Whitten presented the most currently-revised site plan for Financial Plan <br />the proposed Twin Lakes Redevelopment area, and pointed out <br />the areas that had been revised since the Council's last review. <br /> <br />Mr. Whitten briefly reviewed the process to-date, and <br />highlighted his perceived improvements to the latest site plan <br />(i.e., relocation of the proposed Costco to the lower quadrant to <br />facilitate parking and traffic flow; creation of synergy for a <br />"town center" and lTIultiple use continuity; "Main Street" retail <br />concept; and incorporation of stakeholder's panel goals. Mr. <br />Witten opined that, fron1 a housing standpoint, the project could <br />succeed, and further opined that the plan had been revised well to <br />meet the needs of prospective commercial developers. <br /> <br />Councilmen1ber Ihlan questioned and clarified several <br />components of the revised plan related to the relocation of the <br />major retailer, public plaza identification, and access functions. <br /> <br />Councilmen1ber Ihlan also questioned the intent of the developer <br />related to Langton Lake and the apparent extension of the water <br />feature into the developn1ent. <br /> <br />Mr. Whitten noted that the developer was attempting to take <br />advantage of this natural amenity and was looking at various <br />options. <br /> <br />Councilmen1ber Ihlan emphasized that the park was not open for <br />development, and the developer needed to be aware of the <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.