My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2004_1122
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2004
>
CC_Minutes_2004_1122
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:32:39 AM
Creation date
2/16/2006 12:36:57 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
11/22/2004
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
89
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 11/22/04 <br />Minutes - Page 23 <br /> <br />2) Petition from Friends of Twin Lakes dated October 22, <br />2004, with letters of transmittal; <br />3) Environmental Quality Board (EQB) referral letter dated <br />October 25, 2004; <br />4) City Council Minutes dated October 25, 2004 regarding <br />the impact of the petition; <br />5) City Attorney Opinion Letter dated November 3, 2004, <br />with DRAFT letters to Petitioner and Rottlund Homes; <br />6) City Attorney final letters to Petitioner and Rottlund <br />Homes dated November 8, 2004; <br />7) City Council Minutes dated November 8,2004 regarding <br />process for addressing petition; <br />8) Petitioner's letter to City Attorney dated November 10, <br />2004 regarding issues; <br />9) Petitioner's written supplement dated November 15, <br />2004; <br />10) Rottlund Home's written supplement dated November <br />15, 2004; <br />11) Petitioner's written rebuttal dated November 18, 2004; <br />12) Rottlund Home's written rebuttal dated November 18, <br />2004; <br />13) Citizen written comments; <br />14) State Agency Comments <br />a. Department of Natural Resources dated November <br />10,2004 <br />b. Environmental Quality Board dated November 18, <br />2004 and November 19, 2004; and <br />c. Minnesota Pollution Control Agency dated <br />November 19,2004 <br />15) Staff Written Comments. <br /> <br />Mr. Squires noted that, as provided by EQB rules, there were <br />eight criteria to determine whether the AUAR was still valid. <br />Mr. Squires noted that, the EQB rules do not require this hearing, <br />but the process was being followed by the City Council to <br />provide a fair opportunity to be heard, and for staff, in their <br />professional capacities, to provide advice to the City Council. <br /> <br />City Attorney Squires noted that, if any of the eight criteria were <br />identified or if new information were provided, demonstrating <br />that the AUAR analysis was no longer appropriate, it would <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.