My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0310
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0310
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:33:49 AM
Creation date
2/17/2006 12:34:55 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
3/10/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
39
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 3/10/03 <br />Page 4 <br /> <br />printing, and staff time), as staff had provided several <br />different estimates, and Councilmember Schroeder had <br />investigated past budget breakdowns and had another <br />estimate. Staff was directed to provide a firm cost to <br />Council. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn sought a legal opInIon from City <br />Attorney Scott Anderson regarding placement of a policy <br />statement (i.e., whether to continue holding a municipal <br />Primary election) on the ballot, or if it was a Council <br />action. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson responded that there was no <br />provision within city code or state statute for calling for a <br />referendum to determine this issue. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn asked City Attorney Anderson whether <br />the provision should be included in city code; with City <br />Attorney Anderson responding that he would want to <br />review the issue further prior to holding a referendum. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn sought further opinion from City <br />Attorney Anderson regarding a potential conflict of <br />interest by sitting Councilmembers to vote on an issue that <br />would influence their re-election campaign. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson opined that he didn't believe there <br />was a potential conflict of issue regarding a vote on this <br />issue and pending Council re-election campaigns. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn thanked Ms. Curti for her information <br />and the time and effort in her facilitation of the Task <br />Force, and then explained anticipated Public Hearing <br />process to be followed; with approximately Yi hour <br />allotted for the first portion of the Primary Election issue, <br />to be followed by the other Public Hearing regarding the <br />Presbyterian Homes Planned Unit Development (PUD <br />issue; with a return at the close of the Hearing to the <br />Primary Election issue to hear further public testimony. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.