My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2003_0602
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2003
>
CC_Minutes_2003_0602
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:34:54 AM
Creation date
3/8/2006 12:28:08 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
6/2/2003
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
53
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 6/02/03 <br />Page 12 <br /> <br />concept plan presented tonight by the developer; with Mr. <br />J ohannson advising that Council opinion tonight was only <br />essential in whether the Council supported <br />residential/retail, rather than residential/office use. Mr. <br />Johannson advised that if the developer were limited to <br />residential/office use only, there was no reason for them <br />to continue due to market preferences. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka supported the concept, even <br />though new, opining that if it were properly done, it <br />worked well; and that while change was always difficult, <br />he was convinced that it would work given the right mix. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn concurred with Councilmember <br />Maschka; expressing concerns about the placement, but <br />support of the use proposed. <br /> <br />Councilmember Klausing offered no further comment <br />than those already expressed regarding use preferences. <br /> <br />Councilmember Schroeder expressed no concern with <br />those comments made. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn opened the floor for public comment. <br /> <br />AI Sands, 2612 Aldine <br />Mr. Sands spoke against "big box retail," and against the <br />proposed expense of housing; opining that the Council <br />was abandoning the original plan, and if this was the only <br />type of proj ect the market would support, to delay <br />development of the parcel. Mr. Sands, citing his <br />legislative work referenced a TIF survey of cities in the <br />state, concluding that TIF should never be used to support <br />retail, that retail would follow the market. Mr. Sands <br />encouraged further Council review of the Master Plan; <br />opined that this was the wrong project at the wrong time; <br />and that the City could construct the parkway themselves, <br />without any development, and he would support the use <br />of TIF for that; and to avoid any use of eminent domain. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn responded to several of Mr. Sands' <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.