Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 03/27/06 <br />Minutes - Page 11 <br /> <br />Discussion included type of construction for the north side <br />sidewalks (six foot wide concrete); City maintenance of the <br />sidewalks once constructed; drive lanes and single and double <br />lanes; current and future anticipated traffic demographics; and <br />modifications to current high-accident areas to enhance safety. <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom reviewed the total estimated street construction <br />project cost ($4,316,114.35); the City of Roseville share <br />($115,992.13); total assessable footage (2039.12); and the <br />engineer's recommended street asseSSlnent (based on 25% of the <br />project cost per foot at $14.22). <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom reviewed various funding sources and amounts (i.e., <br />County State Aid, County Federal funds; County engineering <br />and design; Roseville utility funds; Roseville Municipal State <br />Aid funds; and Roseville Assessments). Ms. Bloom noted that <br />Roseville assessments, as recommended at 25% of the project <br />cost per foot were estimated at $28,998.03. <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom reviewed State Statute, Chapter 429, with <br />consideration for justifying assessments by treating similar <br />properties equally and the assessment equal to or less than the <br />resulting increase in property value. Ms. Bloom noted that the <br />County Road C Streetscape Framework would benefit the <br />community as a whole and would not be assessed to abutting <br />property owners, with funding sources limited to Federal <br />Enhancement funding and City funds. <br /> <br />Further discussion included proposed assessments of specific <br />commercial properties based on their access or lack of access to <br />County Road C; no proposed assessments for residential <br />properties under staff s proposed recommendations; past curb <br />and gutter installations and/or street projects. <br /> <br />Public Comment <br />Ms. Chris Thompson, 1446 Talisman Curve <br />Ms. Thompson sought assurance from the City Council that the <br />residential property would not be assessed. Ms. Thompson noted <br />that between Pascal and Ramline, there was no access by <br />residential properties, thus no benefit. Ms. Thompson expressed <br />concern about the amount of property lost, noting she'd lost over <br />