My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0508
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:37:57 AM
Creation date
6/20/2006 3:08:59 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
5/8/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 05/08/06 <br />Minutes - Page 11 <br /> <br />meetings; and funding of <br />approved in the 2006 <br />Professional Services budget. <br /> <br />the educational series as <br />Community Development <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke against the motion; and <br />questioned how much total had been spent on Mr. <br />Shardlow's firm to-date. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets noted that approximately $6,000 to- <br />date; and this would be in addition to that, estimated at <br />$2,000; and whether this was the final presentation would <br />need to be determined by the Planning Commission. <br /> <br />Klausing moved, Maschka seconded, approval of <br />Workshop #4 for presentation to the Commission on July <br />5, 2006, with $2,000 (partial funding) for research and <br />presentations from Roseville's Community Development <br />Department Professional Service, line item as well as <br />continued pro-bono support and contributions from DSU. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan reiterated her opposition to the <br />motion; opining that Mr. Shardlow was not a "neutral" <br />participant; had represented specific clients; and favored a <br />vision based on more commercial and retail development <br />within the community. Councilmember Ihlan further <br />opined that, if the Council were going to consider hiring <br />Mr. Shardlow, they should also request alternative <br />consultants; and opined that this was the Planning <br />Commission, rather than the City Council, spending <br />taxpayer monies. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust spoke in support of the motion, <br />opining that past presentations had served as excellent <br />investments of education information compiled by staff <br />and consultants; and would serve as an invaluable resource <br />in moving forward as a community, along with the <br />community visioning process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in opposition to the motion; <br />opining that with a steering committee in place, all <br />committees should be involved (Housing & <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.