Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes - 05/06/02 <br />Page 2 <br /> <br />Kysylyczyn expressed concerns about the Infrastructure <br />Replacement Fund relating to sound tax policy and the <br />proper role of government. <br />Maschka spoke in favor of reserve savings as minimizing <br />taxes, reducing debt costs, and reducing swings in annual <br />tax bills. <br />Schwartz summarized the ways street construction and <br />maintenance are funded, especially for MSA streets, and <br />about various uses of the Infrastructure Improvement <br />Fund. <br />Kough asked how long the City has not assessed <br />residential properties along MSA streets. <br />Kysylyczyn argued against the current and historical <br />assessment policy in the city, citing sound tax policy, <br />benefits, and fairness. <br />Schwartz summarized three options for assessing <br />streetscapes and three options for handling MSA <br />roadway improvements. <br />Kough spoke in favor of assessments relating to benefits, <br />including community benefit. <br />Kysylyczyn suggested a modification of Option 3 of the <br />Streetscape Assessment Options in the staff report, using <br />a 10% assessment rate rather than 15%, and based upon <br />the amount of local costs incurred not total project costs. <br />Klausing commented on who benefits from streetscapes. <br />Maschka favored Option 3 of the MSA Roadway <br />Options. <br />Schroeder suggested a flat assessment rate for all <br />properties and property owners along MSA streets. <br />Kough concurred with Schroeder. <br />Maschka spoke against flat assessment rates on MSA <br />streets. <br />Kysylyczyn concurred with Schroeder and Kough. <br />Klausing spoke against a disparity between assessments <br />of commercial properties at a rate of 25% on MSA <br />streets and a 100% rate on other streets. <br /> <br />III. Public Comment <br />A. Al Sands, resident, distributed a memo on assessment <br />policy, and commented upon the Council's April 22nd <br />meeting. He suggested use of Robert's Rules of Order <br />and common courtesy. <br />