Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Minutes - 06/03/02 <br />Page 5 <br /> <br />response has been favorable to the Wrap. Newsletter <br />intended to provide information only. <br />Kough: reason for discontinuing the Wrap was to save <br />money. Residents have responded and favor the Wrap. <br />Appreciate people's response. <br />Beets: possibly put a rotating column in the Wrap for <br />the Council and Kysylyczyn, a place to share their views <br />with residents. Looking for advice and guidance. <br />Format? Paper? Frequency? Content? We want it to be <br />a vehicle to share information with Roseville Residents. <br />Klausing: Statutory Requirements for Water Quality <br />Report? <br />Schwartz: Report to all consumers by July 1 st of each <br />year. If it is not in the wrap we can do direct mailings. <br />Difficult to put it in water bills because the city bills <br />quarterly. Could do web sites, newspaper ads. <br />Klausing: resident's comments that they liked the <br />calendar. Liked the format, and paper. On the <br />frequency, may be a way to save money (quarterly rather <br />than bimonthly) Wouldn't have a problem with removing <br />the annual calendar as long as the information was <br />contained in the quarterly mailings. <br />Maschka: Does the quarterly scenario work? <br />Pratt: There would be difficulties <br />Curti: would rather go to a 4-page bimonthly. It would <br />work better. <br />Maschka: seems to be cheaper to include Water report <br />in the Wrap. Has received many call, email regarding <br />the elimination of this publication. Would support its <br />reinstatement. <br />Schroeder: feels that the wrap cost too much money. <br />Should put out the wrap for $4,500 half the cost. <br />Kough: in favor of the wrap for a reasonable cost. <br />Recycled paper should be used. <br />Kysylyczyn: supports Kough and Schoeder's comments. <br />Why do residents like the Wrap? People he talked to <br />liked items in the wrap, not necessarily the wrap. For <br />example, schedules, calendars, recycling dates. <br />Schroeder moved, Kysylyczyn seconded, to bring the <br />wrap back into circulation not to exceed $5,000 per <br />issue, with a maximum of 6 issues, to be printed on <br />recycled paper and does not include the cost of <br />