My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2006_0724
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2006
>
CC_Minutes_2006_0724
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:40:08 AM
Creation date
8/16/2006 4:30:43 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
7/24/2006
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
27
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 07/24/06 <br />Minutes - Page 13 <br /> <br />that the project was very invasive for the residents along that <br />street, and this would make the project more intense, but <br />eventually of less duration. <br /> <br />Maschka moved, Ihlan seconded, adoption of Resolution No. <br />10418 entitled, "Resolution Extending Working Hours for <br />Ramsey County, County Road C - Phase II Reconstruction <br />Project. " <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Maschka; Pust; Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None. <br /> <br />8. <br /> <br />Discuss Railroad Easement Requirements for the S Owasso <br />Street Project <br />City Planner Bloom reviewed the South Owasso Boulevard <br />reconstruction project, and the two foot easement for <br />construction of a sidewalk along the section of road adjacent to <br />the railroad tracks, as well as an eight foot wide easement to <br />construct two parking bays on the south side of the road to <br />accommodate on-street parking. Ms. Bloom noted that, in <br />working with the BNSF Railroad management company on the <br />issues since late last year, it was understood that construction of <br />a fence along the sidewalk would not be necessary due to the <br />minimal encroachment. Thus, Ms. Bloom noted that plans were <br />awarded accordingly to include fencing only along the sidewalk <br />adjacent to the two parking bays being constructed. <br /> <br />However, since that time, and upon review of the agreements by <br />the BNSF Public Works Department, the railroad is requiring an <br />additional requirement on the sidewalk easement, for <br />construction of a six foot high fence along the entire length of the <br />new sidewalk. Ms. Bloom noted that the addition of an <br />additional 3,500 feet of fence to the project would mean a <br />substantial increase in cost, and City Council approval. <br /> <br />Staff provided three options for Council consideration, and <br />subsequent additional costs to the project. Options included: <br />building the sidewalk and installing a six foot high fence as <br />required by the railroad; building a five foot wide sidewalk <br />without fence, and by narrowing the sidewalk from the standard <br /> <br />Railroad Easement <br />Requirements <br />S Owasso Street <br />Project <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.