Laserfiche WebLink
<br />City Council Regular Meeting - 08/28/06 <br />Minutes - Page 9 <br /> <br />mass that was considered too dense for this area. Mr. Paschke <br />noted that other Commissioners supported the proposal as <br />presented, indicating the existing mix of this neighborhood and <br />lack of specific identify, as well as achieving Comprehensive <br />Plan directives regarding housing, and meeting the goals and <br />objectives of the City Housing Plan as approved by the Housing <br />and Redevelopment Authority. Mr. Paschke further advised that, <br />while the Planning Commission sent forth a 3/3 vote, and no <br />specific recommendation to the City Council, they created two <br />additional conditions related to creating diversity in housing <br />design; and requiring staff and the developer to explore the <br />establishment of creating town home units that were specifically <br />owner-occupied units. <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke advised that, following the split vote ofthe Planning <br />Commission and additional public comment received at that <br />meeting, and an additional neighborhood meeting held by the <br />applicant and their developers, additional information would be <br />provided by the developer. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan clarified, and staff confirmed, that a <br />Comprehensive Plan Amendment would require a 4/5 vote of the <br />City Council. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough noted ongoing concerns of neighbors <br />related to the town homes and density issues, his personal <br />preference to maintain large lots in the community, and the <br />neighborhood's preference for single family homes only. <br /> <br />John Mahs, <br />Schools <br />Mr. Mahs noted that Mounds View School District <br />Superintendent Dr. Jan Witthuhn, and the District's Attorney, <br />Dan Colton, along with developers, were also present at tonight's <br />meeting. <br /> <br />Applicant Comment <br />applicant representative, Mounds View <br /> <br />Public <br /> <br />Mr. Mahs provided background related to the project, initiated <br />over three years ago; City staff consultation and participation in <br />the project development criteria and preferences; significant <br />monies spent to-date in developing the plan, with input from the <br />