CC_Minutes_2012_0423 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

Regular City Council Meeting Monday,April 23,2012 Page 13 Commission level; and their anticipated process for presentation to the City Council in final draft. Mr. Grefenberg advised that the Task Force identified an additional six (6) weeks for their work to be completed, at which time it would be presented to the entire Human Rights Commission for their review and comment, anticipating that those comments of the Human Rights Commission would provide for addi- tions, not for a substitute opinion, since three (3) of the seven (7) Commission- ers served on the Task Force. After that review, Mr. Grefenberg anticipated a final report to the City Council, with a work plan and recommendation for an additional public hearing once the City Council reviewed the details of the full report. Mr. Grefenberg advised that the Task Force was seeking support from staff and the City Council in promoting the recommendations and organizing a communi- ty forum to solicit additional public comment. Mr. Grefenberg advised that the Task Force was also seeking someone to take meeting minutes of the Task Force for their next and final two (2) meetings, as they reviewed changes and developed a progress report in more detail. Councilmember Willmus sought additional information as to whether this community engagement was seen as an ongoing effort of the Task Force and/or the Human Rights Commission; or once the final document was presented to the City Council, it would be up to the City Council, or designation of them to an- other advisory commission or appointed body for ongoing review and imple- mentation strategies. Councilmember Johnson thanked the Task Force for their report; noting his pre- viously-expressed frustration in not having an update on their progress to-date. Councilmember Johnson expressed his favorable impression of the broad and diverse citizenry serving on the Task Force; and offered his continued support for better communication between local government and the community; whether through use of the Parks Master Plan constellations or neighborhood groups. Councilmember Johnson advised that he still encountered frustration among citizens regarding current communication problems. Mr. Grefenberg noted, unfortunately, that the community forum had not been well-attended; but concurred that there remained citizens who didn't feel they were receiving adequate information, whether through written and/or electronic means. Mr. Grefenberg advised that some comments included the out-of-date nature of news in the City newsletter, City News, as well as their difficulty navi- gating the City's website. Mr. Grefenberg referenced the City of Edina as a communication model, using a citizen engagement blog, and suggested other technological advances that could make communication more accessible. Mr. Grefenberg advised that it was the preference of a major segment of citizens that