My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_0903
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_0903
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:41:46 AM
Creation date
10/31/2006 11:22:56 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
9/3/2002
Meeting Type
Special
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
13
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Special City Council Minutes - 09/03/02 <br />Page 10 <br /> <br />he did have several questions that had been brought to his <br />attention earlier in the day, and asked that the Charter be <br />reviewed by legal Council, but reiterated the Council's <br />obligation to put it on the ballot as requested. <br />Councilmember Schroeder concurred with Councilmember <br />Kough, supporting the Charter and the Council's obligation to <br />put it on the ballot. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn read, for the public record, Minnesota <br />Statute 609.43 regarding "Misconduct of a Public Employee or <br />Official," and quoted those specific areas regarding potential <br />fines and/or imprisonment for a public official intentionally <br />failing or refusing to perform their statutory requirements. <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn further stated that he would be filing civil <br />charges against any Councilmembers voting "no" on this <br />particular motion. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka asked for an opinion from City <br />Attorney Jamnik. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn reiterated his intention to personally file a <br />criminal complaint, along with a member of the Charter <br />Commission, through the City Prosecutor and County Attorney, <br />with them making final determinations. <br /> <br />Councilmember Klausing asked that, rather than threatening <br />Councilmembers with criminal action, City Attorney Jamnik's <br />opinion be allowed. <br /> <br />City Attorney Jamnik responded with his opinion on the intent <br />of the Statute, and potential actions of the County Attorney <br />upon receipt of the Council resolution showing other than a 5-0 <br />vote. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka asked City Attorney Jamnik ifhe <br />would be allowed to abstain, and City Attorney Jamnik <br />responded in the affirmative. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn asked for Councilmember Maschka's <br />reasons for abstention. Councilmember Maschka declined <br />comment on Mayor Kysylyczyn's question. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.