Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Minutes - 09/30/02 <br />Page 14 <br /> <br />forwarded to thelTI by the City of Roseville. Mr. Soler <br />stated that there were no recorded accidents at that <br />intersection due to the lTIOnUn1ent installation; and that a <br />limited number of vehicle turns on red from Lexington <br />onto Larpenteur were recorded at that intersection. <br /> <br />Mr. Soler further stated that the County's first <br />recommendation would be to fully clear the sight lines, but <br />given their existence, would agree to Option 2, providing <br />for installation of a "No Right Turn on Red" sign, to <br />further deten11ine any negative in1pacts. <br /> <br />Mr. Soler had reviewed the effects of Option 2, stating that <br />there was more through traffic on that intersection, which <br />should not be unduly affected by a limited right tun1 <br />restriction. Mr. Soler stated the intersection's largest <br />movement is east to west on Larpenteur and any additional <br />time taken away fron1 n10VelTIent would be a negative. Ivlr. <br />Soler stated that turning movement counts indicate that <br />putting up a "No right Turn on Red" sign would only <br />delay southbound, right turn vehicles. <br /> <br />Councilmen1ber Maschka supported installation of the <br />signage as the least expensive ren1edy. <br /> <br />Dick Lambert, 800 Brenner <br />Mr. Lambert asked if any study had been given to moving <br />the n10ving the monuments to the north side of the <br />sidewalk. <br /> <br />Councilmen1ber Schroeder spoke in favor of ren10val of <br />the three mOnUlTIents to avoid future liability to the City. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn asked City Attorney Janmik to clarify <br />the City's standing ordinance addressing sight angles and <br />construction of obstructions. <br /> <br />City Atton1ey Jamnik concurred with Mayor Kysylyczyn's <br />argument that the City could bring charges against a <br />resident for violating the standing ordinance; further <br />stating that while it n1ay be viewed at a double standard <br />for the City to have iten1s in the sight line, installation of <br />