My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2002_1014
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2002
>
CC_Minutes_2002_1014
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:42:03 AM
Creation date
11/1/2006 8:24:00 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
10/14/2002
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Minutes -10/14/02 <br />Minutes - Page 9 <br /> <br />and/or jury decision; with complex decision-making <br />dynamics. <br />4) Regarding the flag ordinance advice, City Manager <br />Beets questioned the direction provided to the law <br />firm, citing the recent Ordinance request for the <br />discharge of fire arms related to the Honor Guard. <br />5) Regarding the firms drafting of questionable <br />contracts, City Manager Beets challenged that any <br />of the sixty-four law firms would have at one time <br />or another had a judge question the contract <br />language. <br />6) Regarding the alleged serial Council n1eeting, City <br />Manager Beets stated that the City Council, not Mr. <br />J amnik, had made that decision and needed to be <br />held accountable. <br />7) Regarding the concerns of the mis-use of the City of <br />Roseville's nan1e in the firtn's lobbying efforts <br />regarding tax increment financing, in fairness to Mr. <br />J amnik and his firm, they should have an <br />opportuni ty to respond in writing to the Council <br />with an explanation. <br /> <br />City Manager Beets expressed his disappointment and <br />frustration that these concerns had not been brought <br />forward during the decision-making process, and were <br />only being brought forward at this time, particularly if <br />incumbents were not to be considered in the ranking. <br /> <br />Discussion continued with Mayor Kysylyczyn asking <br />whether City Manager Beets had been here during the tin1e <br />period of the items Mayor Kysylyczyn had raised; with <br />City Manager Beets responding in the negative. No <br />further information was available than that brought <br />forward by Mayor Kysylyczyn. <br /> <br />Mayor Kysylyczyn called the vote. <br /> <br />Councilmember Maschka stated that he would be voting <br />"nay" in order to preserve the right to put the item back on <br />the agenda upon Councilmember Kough's return. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.