Laserfiche WebLink
Regular City Council Meeting <br /> Monday,May 14,2012 <br /> Page 20 <br /> City Manager Malinen noted that this also allowed, in a biennial budget process, <br /> one year devoted to strategic planning (year 2) versus budget planning done in <br /> the first year. <br /> Councilmember McGehee stated that she was very happy with the document, <br /> and thanked staff for their nice condensation of long form presentations. Coun- <br /> cilmember McGehee suggested that under "Survey and Community Visioning <br /> Process" (page 4), additional forums for community input be included to receive <br /> citizen stakeholder comments. <br /> Mr. Miller advised that this list was not intended to be all inclusive of every <br /> available option to gather citizen participation in an annual cycle, and noted that <br /> there were many planning processes not listed and outside the realm of this bi- <br /> ennial process. Mr. Miller advised that the intent of this document was to pro- <br /> vide for a broader, visioning process for resource allocation, but not directly <br /> linked to budget allocation. <br /> Councilmember McGehee inquired how the City could measure their areas of <br /> focus; Mr. Miller responded that this would be a Council decision to make, with <br /> staff providing guidance. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the Cobalt Survey process did not seem <br /> to provide the performance measurement capabilities desired to allow citizens to <br /> provide adequate input to their elected officials regarding goal achievement. <br /> She opined that she would prefer a survey instrument that was more local so <br /> that the Council would be able to see how Roseville did relative to other metro <br /> cities. <br /> Mr. Miller clarified that the intent of this document was simply on a conceptual <br /> level, and was not intended to identify a level or dictate a type of survey. <br /> Councilmember McGehee opined that the devil was in the details; and while <br /> this was a very good plan, the City Council would need to be cognizant of those <br /> details moving forward. <br /> Johnson moved, Pust seconded, adoption of Resolution No. 10982 (Attachment <br /> A) entitled, "Resolution Adopting the 2012-2013 Performance Management <br /> Program;" amended to include under"Budget and Program Priorities" (page 10) <br /> language indicating that the "addition or removal of programs should be consid <br /> ered prior to the City Council's ranking exercise." <br /> Roll Call <br /> Ayes: Pust; McGehee; Johnson; and Roe. <br /> Nays: None. <br />