Laserfiche WebLink
cooperation, just generally good relations and more city help <br />with the schools were the major responses: <br />NONE......................................68� <br />GENERAL COOPERATION ........................9� <br />FIGHTING DRUGS .............................6$ <br />ACTIVITIES FOR TEENS .......................5$ <br />HELP WITH THE SCHOOLS ......................9� <br />DEVEL�PMENT ISSUES .........................2% <br />COMMUNITY CENTER ...........................1� <br />Teen activities and drugs programs were also mentioned. <br />"Teen activities" was suggested mare frequently by <br />households containing children and 35-44 year olds. "General <br />cooperation" was the key for Professional-Technical hQUSeholds <br />and Zone 1 residents. "Helping the schools" was the suggestion <br />of 35-44 year olds and Zone I residents. "Fighting drugs" was <br />more critical to post-graduates and Zone 4 residents. <br />Overall, the relations between the City and School District, <br />are vi�wed positively. <br />Summary and Conclusions: <br />The City Staff received a job approval rating of seventy- <br />five percent and a disapproval rating of nine percent. Both the <br />absoluta level of approval and the almost nine-to-one ratio af <br />approval-to-disapproval are among the highest in the Metropolitan <br />Area. The thirty-nine percent of the residents reporting first- <br />hand contact with the staff is much higher than comparable <br />suburban areas. The approval ratings of staff stemmed primarily <br />from good experiences with them; the negative ratings resulted <br />from feelings that the staff could improve. Not only is the <br />staff serving an inordinate number of citizens, it is doing so <br />extremely well. <br />114 <br />