Laserfiche WebLink
The "RoseviZle Newsletter:" <br />Residents were asked a pair of questions about the city <br />newsletter. Initially receipt and readership was established: <br />Do you receive the bimonthly "Roseville <br />Newaletter��? Do you reqularly read <br />the ne�sletter? <br />Eighty-seven percent received the newsletter, while seventy-eight <br />percent read it: <br />RECEIVE/READ ..............................78� <br />RECEiVE/DON�T READ .........................9� <br />DON'T RECEIVE .............................12% <br />DON'T KNOW/REFUSED .........................1� <br />This is a comparatively good readexship figure. <br />it. <br />Readership rates were even higher among: <br />* Senior couples <br />* Home owners <br />* $50,000-$62,500 yearly income households <br />* Zone 3 residents <br />Renters more often received the newsletter, but did not read <br />Non-receipt was highest among renters and over 10 unit <br />apartment buil.dings. <br />Next, suggested changes were elicited: <br />Are there any chaaqes ia the format <br />or coverage you �ould like to see? <br />�hat are they3 <br />A small minority would like to see more information on the city <br />council and its activities: <br />NO ANSWER .................................22� <br />NONE ......................................49% <br />MORE ON CITY COUNCIL .......................3% <br />MORE OFTEN .................................1% <br />SENI�R NEWS ................................1� <br />SCATTERED RESPONSES ........................2� <br />Otherwise, there were na major suggestions for modifications. <br />156 <br />