Laserfiche WebLink
Roseville Human Rights Commission <br />Meeting Minutes — July 08, 2008 <br />Page 2 of 4 <br />2 Further discussion included a commonly therned script for contact; advantages of involving <br />3 entities in planning prior to setting a date and/or topic(s); mixed feelings for vidcotaping the <br />4 forum versus maintaining privacy and honest dialogue of participants; future involvemeni and <br />5 interest of the City of Shoreview's Community Development Department in involvir�g <br />6 businesses and providing business contacts to the HRC; and possible credit given for student <br />7 involvement similar to that used during the Patriot Forum. <br />8 <br />9 Ms. Hite advised thaf out of a goal of 70 participants, thcy had 54 attend, and received positive <br />10 feedback of the experience, and anticipated morc participation next Lime due to word-of mouth <br />11 advertising. <br />12 <br />13 Addztional discussion included how to choose speakers and match them to thosc attending; <br />14 accuracy of the School District's demographic and cultural data based on school open enrollment <br />15 and University of MN graduate siudent families, and how it compares to city-wide data and <br />16 ethnicities. <br />17 <br />18 Ms. Hite advised that they held their fonxm in April, with a gathering tirne for food at 6:30 p.m., <br />19 followed by the presenters and panels from 7:00 — 9:00 p.m., and were pleasantly surprised that <br />20 discussions continued and people lingered when it was tirne to end. <br />21 <br />22 Loudi Rivamonte, United Way's Cultural Dynamics Committee Coordinator <br />?3 Ms. Rivamonte reviewed assistance available from the United Way and options for choosing <br />L4 presenters based on thc needs of the community and cultures represented; assistance in guiding <br />25 questions for panelists; what welcome means based on backgound, awareness and cultural <br />26 sharing; ways to recognize and build trust among cultures; and provided references af other <br />27 communities thc linited Way �aad worked with and the success of their Cultural <br />28 Complementarity Model developed by the United Way's Cultural Dynamics Committee. <br />29 <br />30 Ms. Rivamonte provided handouts with additional ideas for dialogue. <br />31 <br />32 Ms. Rivamonte clarified that the Cotnplementarity model was different from iraining sessions <br />33 and was developed to provide an opportunity for community engagement and cross-cultural <br />34 communication tools as a blueprint for businesses to use, instcad of or in lieu of training; how to <br />35 work with each other and ciients and how to meet your neighbors. Ms. Rivamonte said this was <br />36 accomplished through a"Village" concept rather than a facilitated forum to develop an attitude <br />37 of abundance, using an inclusive approach by sharing experiential leasning, what we've <br />3$ cxperienced, and how we've internalizcd it while getiing perspectives from others. <br />39 <br />�40 Additional discussion included the trust and good will built through this model; the checklist <br />�1 provided by United Way and the HRC's progress through the checklist being on track for an <br />42 October forurn; a community recruitment chart developed by the City of Shoreview; and costs <br />43 paid by Shoreview for consultation/facilitation to the United Way, food and beverages, <br />44 printing/postage costs. <br />45 <br />h6 Ms. Hite left the meeting at this rime. <br />