2003 Agendas and Packets - Laserfiche WebLink

Home

JAN-06-2063 15��i CITY-D�-RDSEVILLE-�1DP1i�l 65149�2276 P.10�f2 .• i�f r crv �VSr✓ a� - r.� �.n r r, a n �.wc.rv� . u��...�n ti� i o1G.).J7uCJJO r. KJ� Nir. Neal �e�ts 3�rua� +6, �OQ3 P�� 3 af G expa�ssive activity, where tho p�in�ipal f��tio�n of s�Gh pr�p�rdy would be disrupted by expr�ssive �,ciivit�r_ Exarnpl�� f �o�p�ublic #`ar� inr�ude �sons �d m�litary bases, nited St�x�s v. Alberqa�, 472 U.�, 67�, �85-86 (1�5�); �rreex v. S�acl� 424 U.S. $28, 838 (1976}. Und�r this framework, the City Councit ch�mbess, es wei� as va�ried mCeziu�� xoorn9 at thG �O�ral, �re class�f ed �s desig�ated oar iimitcd public forti. �. Nc�tr�� T�flne, Pl�c� �er� 11+��n7��r I�es�rlc�ioa� Limit�d public fora m�y b� �egulated o�tl�r � canter,t neutral titne, pla� a�d rn�e�r restrictions. s�lsen 925 �_2d �t 69. To survive�udicial sc,�utiny, sucb tes�ictions must be ju�t�fied without reference to the cont.�nt eithe reguIated sp@er.h, must be n�rowly ta�lored to se,�ve � siguificant governraental interes� and must l�a,ve open ample aitcrnativc �han�ls of �orramunicati� of the informa�tio� Intern�tiQ�I_�ociet rLfar Krishna Gonscaousness Inc.. v. �.,�t S�5 U�S. 67�, 675-79; Cc�rnelius v�AACP Le�l �JefenS� ��d Educationa.� �und, 473 U.�. 788, 8D0 (1985). The go�ermnent may ]imn �ccess to certain speakers (e.�, student g�coups) ar� certain subje�ts {school bc�rd bnsiness). W�� v. V'u�ce�t. 454 ZJ.S. 2�3 (1981); Ci�+_o��vladison doin# S�haol Disttict v�. Wisc+onsin Publxc Employ_nnent R�latio}� �vrn�m'n, �29 U.S. 167 (197b). It a�so need nat keep suc$ a fonim vpen it�defmitely_ Pe�x 460 U.S. at 46. However, t�s�i�t��r�s �� nse o�' ave.ilsbilny must bo applied e�v��d��y #o alx s�i�ax'ly situ�tsd parti�s. Id. at 45-4� �nd n,7. U'nde� this irameworl�, a ci�.y may n�t restriCt �e use p� city f$eilities sa as to deuy flrc�ss tn any on� particulat p�nup_ S�ch a reguiatien woux� �ot b� coritp t neu�ral b�sus� it c��a� ba appli�d +�►iihout re�rd to �he ry'pe o�oxgeni�#ion or spr�eh that mny occe�r at a �perticulet meefsz�g� k��tha�more, it is not applied �venhand�di,y �o �1 s�x�ila�rIy situ.ated patt�e,a, b�t des��ned $pcc�f c�lly ta tar�t one g�roup A� re�ilati4n pf t#�is sort �annat b� justified without re�erence ta ths conr�mt Q�ihc s�eech, ax�c! th�re�ore would n4t survivc judi�ia� scr+ntir�y- �s1 #�1C ��'tCt b�tl(�, � C1�► �RS the �ilit�r tp T�str�ict �e use of city facilities fo C�� houxs. Th�is r��trict��n i� eonierer�t neu�rai, as �t app�ie� wit�aut re�d tQ t�e type of org��aLion or speech t�hat may nccut at a paorticulae meetin�,. Seco�d. th� �gUlation is na�mowly ta�lored #o sccve � sig�if�ar�t gov�mmenial int�erest. On thc questian of whether a regu�ation is narrow�ly taxlored to rrchieve rhe significant governmenta� i�tere�t, the Supneme Cou�rt �tes �tr�es�cd thaq the time plac.� anri ma�n+�r requiremer�s need not be the least rest3rictiv� or l�ast intrnsive Ynean� of athieving the ga�retn�ent's end. �ather, thc requirernent of narrovv tailorimg �s satisfied "sn lnng a� the. _.reguLatipn promotes a substan�ial �overnm�n�i interest �hat �v�uid ltie achie�ved le�s �fe�tY�l,► abse�t the re�ula�tion." ��rd v. R��k .��R��an, 4� 1 U.S. 7$ �(19$9) (Q�otia� Clark, 468 U.S, �t 293�.