My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
2008 station study
Roseville
>
Studies, Task Forces, Special Committees, Reports
>
Fire Station
>
2008 station study
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
5/9/2014 12:10:43 PM
Creation date
6/4/2012 4:16:18 PM
Metadata
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
Stat�on Location, Apparatus, and Staffing Analyais <br />Roseville, MN <br />emergency and non-emergency calls. Thus, the travel response times may actually be better than <br />records indicate for emergency calls. <br />Total Time — The total response time is referred to as the time elapsing between receipt <br />of the emergency cail and arrival of the responding unit to the scene of the incident. For <br />mathematical reasons, one cannot simply add the 90�' percentile call processing, turnout, and <br />travel time segments to reach the tota190°i percentile response time. Typically, the total response <br />time is calculated using the difference between ihe arrival time and the call received/alarm time <br />seg�nent. As previously rnentioned, however, RFD does not keep track of the time the call is <br />received. As a result, i:his precluded the total response time interval from being calculated and <br />analyzed in this study. <br />Recommendation 3: Monitor the time of which calls are initially received by E9II. This <br />would allow for accurate assessment of the total response time interval for RFD and to deterxnine <br />whether or not this segment complies with NFPA guidelines.2 <br />Standards and Compliance <br />NFPA 1710 — The National Fire Protection Agency (NFPA) 1710 offers benchmark <br />standards for response times. These nationally accepted guidelines are commonly used as a <br />performance goal for carecr fire departments. Table 2 illustrates the NFPA standards for each <br />response time segment and RFD's level of compliance. <br />Table 2: RFD Compliance with NFPA 1790, 2007 <br />Response Tlme NFPA 90'" Percerrtile RFD 9a"' Psrcentile RFD Complfance <br />S ment Goal 20Ui Percerrtlle <br />Cafl Processin 00:01:00 00:01:09 N/A <br />Tumout 00:01:00 00:01:003 100 <br />Travel 95� Due Unit 00:04:OU 00:07:00 50 <br />Total (1S� Due Unit) 00:06:Q0 N/A N�p4 <br />Total (1st Full Alarm 00:08:00 00:07:00 NIA4 <br />Assi nment <br />As noted, the RFD compliarice for the call processing time interval cannot be measured <br />as this se�nent is extrapolated from the 5t. Paul Fire Department. The strongest compliance for <br />Z NFPA l 710 standards recommend a total response time of 4 minutes or less for the first <br />arriving engine company andlor S minutes for the deployment of first full alarm assignment at a <br />fire suppression incident. <br />3 This time interval is an approximation and based on information provided by RFD. <br />4 The total response time interval could not be calculated as call initiation/alarm times were noi <br />provided in the CAD data. <br />System Planning Corporation 11 May 2008 <br />TriData Division <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.