Laserfiche WebLink
5tation Location, Apparatus, and Staffing AnaIysis <br />iLoseville, MN <br />All three fire stations were built while Roseville was a developing city. Now the city is <br />nearly fully developed and all essential infrastructures are in place. However, the city has <br />experienced more than $500 million in commercial re-development in the last 1 Q years. Tbe <br />increase in retail and industrial business and the cozresponding increase in non-resident <br />commuters are changing the demographics of the city and affecting fire, EMS, hazardous <br />materials, and vehicle rescue responses. <br />This report provides an analysis of the city's current fire stations and sets out <br />recommendations for the number of, and location of future fire stations. The report also includes <br />recommendations for the appropriate level of on-duty stafFing to meet service demands <br />Current Station Conditions and Serviceabi�iiy <br />The current condition of fire stations in Roseville ranges from fair to very poor condition. <br />None of the stations are in compliance with current construction or safety codes and one station <br />has serious health problems due to mold and water leaks. Additionally, all the stations ne�d <br />better heating and cooling systems to make efficient use of costly utilities. Specific issues <br />include; <br />Maintenance Issues — The triage team abserved water leaks, falling plaster, and <br />outdated plumbing, electrical, and mechanical systems. The structures are also craxnped for <br />crews and provide very poor quarters for female staff inembers. Additionally, there are concerns <br />of asbestos used in cor�shuction of the structures and some structural settling and cracking <br />occurring in support wails and apparatus floors. <br />Safeiy Issues — The most acute problem in station #1 was the presence of mold in <br />several parts of the buildings and the health hazard presented to personnel who might inhale the <br />spores from the airborne contarnuiation. None of the 3 stations had a proper area for turnout <br />storage, and all gear was stored in i:he respective apparatus bays. More exhaust venting is needed <br />for exhaust fume extraction. Additional facilities for gear washing and proper biological <br />decontainivation areas should be created. All stations had basements or second floors but no <br />handicapped access is provided; ihis is a violation of ADA provisions £or public buildings. <br />Bccause of an advanced state of disrepair and the number of problems present in the <br />stY-uctures, it would be best if stat�ons #1 and #2 were replaced with a new structure or structures. <br />Both stations are quite old and do noi have adequate modern vehicle storage (bay) areas. <br />Vehicular access to the sfations is very cramped with small doors and tight turnarounds. Station <br />#1 is at the end of its service life span and with many structural and health problems including <br />extensive mold infestations a very significaxit health issue. Station #2 presents a major access <br />System Planning Corporation b May 20�8 <br />TriData Division <br />