Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville City Council <br />Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 13 of 38 <br />7. Conduct a Public Hearing for Street Reconstruction and Assessments <br />for Neighborhood 10 <br />Mayor Klausing opened the Public Hearing at approximately 7:35 p.m. <br /> <br />City Engineer Deb Bloom advised that several members of the audience had <br />not heard the presentation on the proposed improvements, and briefly re- <br />viewed the City's Pavement Management Plan (PMP) and its status to-date <br />and street rating program. <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom spoke to the informational meetings held with the neighborhood <br />to-date; consideration being given by the Arden Hills City Council for order- <br />ing feasibility study for the project in conjunction with the City of Roseville <br />for the process, with Roseville conditioning the project upon the involve- <br />ment of the City of Arden Hills. <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom suggested that the City of Roseville consider approving ordering <br />a feasibility study for Option 2, with the involvement of the City of Arden <br />Hills. Ms. Bloom discussed and outlined the process, with staff coming <br />back before the City Council in the fall of 2007 and proposed construction in <br />2008. Ms. Bloom advised that, under Option 2, the proposed estimated as- <br />sessment rate would be $32.30, with the assessment, for payable taxes in <br />2010, based on actual construction costs; and a total estimated cost of <br />$350,771.68, with funding through the City Infrastructure funds, storm util- <br />ity costs, and assessments. <br /> <br />Ms. Bloom advised that she would visit with interested residents on their in- <br />dividual estimated assessments; reviewed the assessment deferral option and <br />how to determine qualification; and reviewed the neighborhood; current As- <br />sessment Policy; and proposed assessment calculation. <br /> <br />Discussion included this project not being eligible for Minnesota State Aid <br />(MSA) funding; cost projections and contingencies and assessment on actual <br />costs, not estimates; cost advantages for types ofprojects (i.e., curb & gutter; <br />total reconstruction versus mill and overlay); and cooperative construction <br />with Arden Hills with one of their projects; (south of County Road E and <br />west Snelling Avenue); storm sewer and drainage issues; average rating of <br />80 due to City construction standards; individual home owner service lines <br />and responsibilities and cost savings for replacement during the construction <br />project; and clarification of the process and intent of tonight' s action. <br />