My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0129
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0129
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:44:44 AM
Creation date
2/27/2007 3:51:56 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
1/29/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
138
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Roseville City Council <br />Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 17 of 38 <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that the City had provided notice to the licen- <br />see annually, and concurred that there was no reason for deviation from the <br />presumptive penalty. <br /> <br />Roll Call <br />Ayes: Roe; Kough; Pust; Ihlan and Klausing. <br />Nays: None <br /> <br />9. Consider Further Action for Green Mill Restaurant Liquor Violation <br />City Attorney Scott Anderson reviewed his letter of January 3, 2007 regard- <br />ing the liquor violation hearing by Administrative Law Judge Richard Luis <br />regarding the Green Mill Restaurant liquor violation from October of 2005; <br />and findings of fact, conclusions, and recommendations in favor of the City; <br />upholding the presumptive penalty as imposed by the City Council. <br /> <br />Discussion included presumptive versus mandatory penalty; recommenda- <br />tion of the Administrative Law Judge; impact for imposition of penalty for <br />one-day suspension with current financial situation as opposed to that in <br />2005; and process for an agreement between Chief of Police and licensee re- <br />garding the date for suspension. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust recognized the unique circumstances involving the <br />penalty process and actions taken to-date; and requested that Police Chief <br />Sletner take that into consideration in determining the date for the one-day <br />suspenslOn. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted the need to reimburse the license holder for <br />their $500 contribution to charity as previously imposed, so as not to exceed <br />the presumptive penalty imposed by the ordinance. <br /> <br />Councilmember Roe recognized the changes experienced and arguments <br />made by Green Mill regarding their change in business with mall construc- <br />tion; but noted the need for the Police Chiefs discretion in making sure the <br />penalty was felt by the license holder for future compliance concerns. <br /> <br />Pust moved, Roe seconded, acceptance of the first recommendation of the <br />Administrative Law Judge dated December 28,2006, and approval of the <br />imposition of a presumptive penalty of $500 and a one-day suspension <br />against the Green Mill of Roseville; not accepting the second recommenda- <br />tion of the Administrative Law Judge that the Police Chief and license <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.