Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Roseville City Council <br />Minutes of 1/29/07 Pg 8 of 38 <br />Councilmember Kough spoke in support of the motion. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson clarified that various counselors representing <br />the City to-date: Jim Casserly of Krass Monroe, as development <br />Counsel for the City; Mr. Reuvers of the Iverson Reuvers firm as at- <br />torney for litigation between Friends of Twin Lakes v. the City, and <br />selected as one of five firms provided and recommended by the <br />LMCIT; with Mr. Reuvers also handling two other litigation issues on <br />land use matters, one a taking claim from a landowner in the Twin <br />Lakes redevelopment area, and another for an unrelated land use is- <br />sue. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan spoke in support of the motion; opining that the <br />Iverson Reuvers firm had represented the City as co-defendant with <br />the developer in the litigation brought by the Friends of Twin Lakes v. <br />the City; and opined the need for a fresh perspective and new, inde- <br />pendent counsel to best represent citizen taxpayers and a potentially <br />adverse relationship. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson cautioned that, assuming the City Council <br />voted to choose new counsel, they would need to obtain another list of <br />approved attorneys from the LMCIT, pursuant to the insurance <br />agreement between the City and the LMCIT. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan noted that City Attorney Anderson's opinion <br />had not been requested; and reiterated that the several other firms had <br />already been approved by the LMCIT, and if necessary, the LMCIT <br />could be advised by the City that the firms previously expressing in- <br />terest were being considered as new independent counsel. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson advised that, whether his opinion had been <br />requested by one Councilmember or not, it was his duty to advise the <br />full Council, as their legal counsel, of their contractual agreement and <br />the terms of the LMCIT insurance agreement (Section I, Part 2, Page <br />8) with the City of Roseville. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing spoke in opposition to the motion; opining that three <br />law firms were already involved in the case: that of the City's Attor- <br />ney; services of Rod Krass and Jim Casserly for financial and devel- <br />opment issues; and the firm ofIverson Reuvers for their expertise. <br />