Laserfiche WebLink
260 Mr. Schwartz advised that he and Mr. Maloney could discuss this with the RWMWD and advise the <br />261 GLWMO Board of that discussion. <br />262 <br />263 Mr. Malone concurred, and opined that it would be a nice way for the RWMWD to introduce themselves <br />264 to GLWMO constituents. <br />265 <br />266 Member Withhart concurred, suggesting that the introduction and alerting residents to available <br />267 educational efforts and information could be combined. <br />268 <br />269 Member Huffman opined that it would be preferable that the notice come via the RWMWD versus the <br />270 member cites. <br />271 <br />272 Member Withhart noted that recent articles in the local newspapers had included updates on the status and <br />273 future of the GLWMO, opining that this should have provided some preliminary information for <br />274 constituents. <br />275 <br />276 Mr. Maloney opined that, when it appeared on the property tax statements, it would become a reality for <br />277 constituents. <br />278 <br />279 Member Withhart noted that there remained a disconnect on property tax statements when the "other" line <br />280 combined numerous taxes and/or fees; and based on property value changes experienced as well. <br />281 <br />282 BMP Cost -share contract language with member cities <br />283 At the request of Chair Miller, Mr. Petersen provided the GLWMO Board with an update on BMP cost - <br />284 share plans in process; and anticipated transfer of any projects still outstanding to member cities if so <br />285 directed by the Board. Mr. Petersen noted that the City of Roseville currently served as the fiscal agent <br />286 for the GLWMO Board; but that there were pending BMP projects for both member cities, with no board <br />287 in place in the future to approve them procedurally. <br />288 <br />289 Mr. Petersen suggested that the GLWMO Board, at their April 2012 meeting as projects were confirmed, <br />290 encumber funds for those projects, contingent upon their completion this some; and once the RCD <br />291 certified completion of the projects and that they were completed according to plans and material <br />292 stipulations, the GLWMO would then approve reimbursement of funds, or empower its fiscal agent to <br />293 reimburse those funds in the future. <br />294 <br />295 With maximum reimbursement amounts per project set at $2,500 for each shoreline project and $1,000 <br />296 for each rain garden project; Mr. Schwartz advised that there would be no problem with the City of <br />297 Roseville staff approving payment as long as they were under $5,000. Mr. Schwartz advised that he <br />298 would consult with the City's Finance Department on the appropriate process to be followed; how to <br />299 close out the GLWMO Board's books; and assignment of pending assets and liabilities to member cities. <br />300 <br />301 Member Withhart suggested that the GLWMO Board authorize the City of Roseville, as the GLWMO <br />302 Board's fiscal agent, to take action accordingly, with the details to be finalized at a later date. <br />303 <br />304 Mr. Maloney suggested a fixed date to transfer those responsibilities. <br />305 <br />306 Motion 12- 0311-04 <br />307 Member Withhart moved, and Member Barrett seconded approval of the transfer of the GLWMO Board's <br />308 asset and liability responsibilities and functions to the City of Roseville as the GLWMO Board's fiscal <br />309 agent, effective upon successful dissolution of the GLWMO Board June 22, 2012. <br />310 <br />6 <br />