Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Special City Council Meeting <br />Thursday, March 29, 2007 <br />Page 2 of 20 <br />Mr. Keel led the discussion specific for each of eight categories, or areas of inter- <br />est: community; safety; housing, environment, parks, open space, recreation and <br />wellness; education; infrastructure, and finance and revenue. <br />Areas of influence impacting and influencing each category included: City Coun- <br />cil; other elected officials (other government units and agencies); business com- <br />lllunity; faith community; civic organizations; schools; and individual residents and <br />collective resident neighborhoods or interest groups. <br /> <br />With each category, goals were identified, and strategies outlined, with some of the <br />strategies having suggested options and alternatives for achieving goals and objec- <br />tives. <br /> <br />Mr. Keel emphasized that the visioning purpose was not to provide specific an- <br />swers to community issues, but to provide a strategic work plan that described <br />Roseville today - its strengths and weaknesses - and areas of interest identified for <br />future consideration. Mr. Keel noted that the visioning process would hopefully <br />serve as a point of reference for fhture decisions, as a living document, about what <br />Roseville should be; and was a product of significant public involvement, and thus <br />representative of the comlllunity. Mr. Keel cautioned that the document, to relllain <br />effective and remain of value, needed to be periodically updated; and referenced by <br />the entire community as decisions are made about its future. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust arrived at this tillle. <br /> <br />Mr. Keel expressly thanked the subcommittee members, and their Chairpersons, <br />along with the residents and businesses in the community who became civically <br />engaged during this process and provided invaluable input, suggestions and enthu- <br />siasm to the proj ect. <br /> <br />Mr. Keel noted that, in each category, common themes kept recurring; most no- <br />ticeably the community's desire for reasonable funding and fiscal management, <br />with an inclination toward "frugality." <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough expressed his personal appreciation to those who partici- <br />pated - both the committees and citizens. Councilmember Kough noted that, as an <br />elected official, the citizens he talked to appeared concerned with keeping current <br />services intact. Councilmember Kough expressed his personal concerns regarding <br />whether the community needed more retail; opined the need for more pathways, <br />