My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0416
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0416
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:45:52 AM
Creation date
5/3/2007 1:33:14 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/16/2007
Meeting Type
Study
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
52
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />City Council Study Session <br />Monday, April 16, 2007 <br />Page 8 <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing thanked staff and the study group representatives for <br />their work and expressed anticipation of the completed report in May. <br /> <br />By Councilmember consensus, staff was directed to complete their <br />study and present their full recommendations to the City Council in <br />mid-May (May 14, 2007 Council Study Session), after the expiration <br />of the moratorium on April 23, 2007; and allowing an additional pres- <br />entation to the City's Planning Commission for their input prior to <br />presenting recommendations to the City Council . <br /> <br />b. Sign Regulations - Review and Discussion of Modifications to <br />Roseville Sign Regulations <br />City Planner Thomas Paschke presented the most recent version of the <br />Sign Regulation ordinance amendment, as reviewed by the Planning <br />Commission and City Attorney, following its most recent revisions, <br />and a total of six Public Hearings heard at the Planning Commission <br />level. Mr. Paschke recognized those members of the Planning Com- <br />mission - current and present - for their extensive work on refining <br />the document (Planning Commissioners Mary Bakeman, Dan Boerig- <br />ter and former Commissioner Tammy Pust). <br /> <br />Mr. Paschke opined that the proposed document, as amended, was <br />well-designed and will allow for future growth in the City's sign area <br />and create a staff review process responsive to changes in the sign in- <br />dustry and technologically, and review and approval of specific sign- <br />age throughout the City utilizing the Development Review Committee <br />(DRC) and a Master Sign Plan procedure. <br /> <br />Considerable discussion ensued regarding definitions of and types of <br />flashing or electronic signs; addition of City Attorney recommenda- <br />tions (i.e., severability clause); and various sections revised to avoid <br />contradictory language; the impact of including illustrations within the <br />language, with the inclusion of language regarding diagrams for illus- <br />trative purposes only, with text controlling the ordinance; and rational <br />for prohibiting scrolling, rotating and/or changing images and their <br />distraction potential. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.