My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
CC_Minutes_2007_0423
Roseville
>
City Council
>
City Council Meeting Minutes
>
200x
>
2007
>
CC_Minutes_2007_0423
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/17/2007 9:46:08 AM
Creation date
5/15/2007 9:46:50 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Roseville City Council
Document Type
Council Minutes
Meeting Date
4/23/2007
Meeting Type
Regular
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
55
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
View images
View plain text
<br />Regular City Council Meeting Minutes <br />Monday, April 23, 2007 <br />Page 9 <br /> <br />sponsibilities, thus their designation of Roseville rather than Arden <br />Hills. <br /> <br />Discussion included the role the City of Arden Hills would play in <br />proposed development; the City of Roseville Planning Commission's <br />role in requesting EA W as part of the requested amended Planned <br />Unit Development (PUD) for Northwestern College; the purpose of <br />the EA W as a scoping document, to hold a Public Hearing and make <br />findings to make a negative or positive declaration to determine <br />whether an Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is necessary; and <br />whether the City's Community Development Department would be <br />reimbursed for staff time by the developer as part of their reimburs- <br />able costs. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing opined that the EA W won't recognize political <br />boundaries, but general impacts to contiguous properties; and may <br />also provide the City with some authority as the reviewing entity by <br />providing greater control over environmental impacts of the PUD. <br /> <br />Councilmember Ihlan opined that she wasn't prepared to vote on ac- <br />cepting the designation without contacting the City of Arden Hills and <br />obtaining additional information. <br /> <br />City Attorney Anderson, when questioned regarding time constraints, <br />clarified that time constraints for the EA W review period would only <br />commence upon publication of the EA W, allowing response time for <br />agency review. <br /> <br />Mr. Stark opined that, since the City's Planning Commission had re- <br />quested the EA W, staff had assumed there would be City Council <br />support for the EA W process. <br /> <br />Councilmember Pust opined that, with a project of this size and its po- <br />tential impacts, she was supportive of an EA W; and was willing to ac- <br />cept the RGU role and designation.. Councilmember Pust noted that, <br />since the City of Roseville was most impacted by access points, traffic <br />concerns and other impacts, the City should retain their designation as <br />the RGD. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.