Laserfiche WebLink
<br />Regular City Council Meeting <br />Monday, June 11,2007 <br />Page 18 <br /> <br />was unfortunate that there was only a short period of time to work on <br />it. Ms. Schaffer urged the City Council to consider broadening the <br />study further with or without a moratorium in place, opining that the <br />issue for a suburb such as Roseville was of paramount importance in <br />maintaining interest in the community and providing affordable hous- <br />ing. Ms. Schaffer encouraged the City Council to broaden community <br />input by seeking involvement from those not already part of the gov- <br />ernment system to gain their perspective; and while expressing appre- <br />ciation to the Planning Commission for their willingness to take on <br />additional assignments, noted that the Study Group had been domi- <br />nated by Planning Commission members. Ms. Schaffer again encour- <br />aged the City Council to continue to do the other half of the study to <br />determine what it told and to broaden the input base. <br /> <br />Mayor Klausing sought clarification from Ms. Schaffer on what spe- <br />cifically should be studied further and what factual background in- <br />formation was not included in the report. <br /> <br />Ms. Schaffer questioned whether "factual information" was a factual <br />statement; and advised the need for the Council to consider a policy <br />on how subdivisions and/or recombinations should work, as they <br />weren't addressed in the current report. <br /> <br />Tim Callaghan, 3062 Shorewood Lane <br />Mr. Callaghan opined that statements in the report seemed awfully <br />simplistic, and noted that CAG started their report by stating that more <br />time was needed. Mr. Callaghan further opined that there was no <br />comparable city information and no alternative options. Mr. Cal- <br />laghan provided his personal perspective on why he lived in Rose- <br />ville, and his appreciation of his large lot and neighborhood character- <br />istics; and questioned the apparent report recommendations that <br />neighborhood character didn't need to be preserved, and whether the <br />CAG was represented by any property owner having been impacted <br />by a lot split in their neighborhood. <br /> <br />Councilmember Kough noted the map provided by the Community <br />Development Department identifying 100 lots that could potentially <br />be split, and his concerns that developers will purchase multiple lots <br />with the intent to subdivide them. <br />